About: Ramos v. Louisiana

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Ramos v. Louisiana Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/4gNJcT4CF1

Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon and Louisiana were affected by the ruling because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Ramos v. Louisiana (en)
rdfs:comment	Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon and Louisiana were affected by the ruling because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana. (en)
rdfs:seeAlso	Edwards v. Vannoy
foaf:name	Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana (en)
dct:subject	2020 in United States case law Legal history of Louisiana United States Sixth Amendment sentencing case law United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court 21st-century American trials United States jury case law
Wikipage page ID	63714874 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1118638892 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Samuel Alito Privileges or Immunities Clause Brett Kavanaugh 2020 in United States case law Legal history of Louisiana United States Sixth Amendment sentencing case law John Roberts Johnson v. Louisiana United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines case law Due Process Clause Incorporation of the Bill of Rights United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg Louisiana Circuit Courts of Appeal Clarence Thomas Elena Kagan Apodaca v. Oregon Louisiana Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Stare decisis Stephen Breyer U.S. Supreme Court Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution 21st-century American trials Jury trial Sonia Sotomayor United States jury case law Neil Gorsuch Oregon Certiorari Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution La. Ct. App. Jim Crow law So. 3d Unanimous
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/590/18-5924/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4746633/ramos-v-louisiana/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/inlaco20171106146 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-5924 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-5924_n6io.pdf
sameAs	Ramos v. Louisiana Ramos v. Louisiana
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:See_also dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:US6thAmendment
Dissent	Alito (en)
docket	18 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Roberts; Kagan (en)
JoinMajority	Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh ; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor ; Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
LawsApplied	Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-5924
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-5924
ParallelCitations	17280.0 (second)
Prior	259200.0 (second)
USPage	___ (en)
USVol	590 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-10-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2019 (xsd:integer)
case	Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4746633/ramos-v-louisiana/
DecideDate	0001-04-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2020 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana (en)
Holding	The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/590/18-5924/
Litigants	Ramos v. Louisiana (en)
majority	Gorsuch (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-5924_n6io.pdf
has abstract	Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon and Louisiana were affected by the ruling because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana. (en)
Concurrence	Thomas (en) Kavanaugh (en) Sotomayor (en)
Overturned previous case	Apodaca v. Oregon , Johnson v. Louisiana (en)
QuestionsPresented	Whether the Fourteenth Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict. (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software