Rational choice (also termed rationalism) is a prominent framework in international relations scholarship. Rational choice is not a substantive theory of international politics, but rather a methodological approach that focuses on certain types of social explanation for phenomena. In that sense, it is similar to constructivism, and differs from liberalism and realism, which are substantive theories of world politics. Rationalist analyses have been used to substantiate realist theories, as well as liberal theories of international relations.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - عقلانية (علاقات دولية) (ar)
- Rasionalisme (hubungan internasional) (in)
- Rationalism (international relations) (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - غالبًا ما يُنظر إلى العقلانية في السياسة على أنها نقطة الوسط بين وجهتي نظر سياسيتين رئيسيتين، الواقعية والأممية. تميل العقلانية إلى اتباع حل وسط في معظم القضايا، وتجد حلًا وسطًا أيضًا بين وجهتي النظر المتضاربتين السابقتين، وذلك في الوقت الذي تترنح فيه حلول الواقعية والأممية على الجانبين. (ar)
- Rasionalisme dalam politik sering dipandang sebagai titik tengah di antara tiga pandangan politik utama, yaitu realisme, rasionalisme, dan internasionalisme. Bila diibaratkan timbangan, realisme dan internasionalisme ada di ujung timbangan, sedangkan rasionalisme ada di tengah hampir di sebagian besar permasalahan dan berusaha menjembatani dua pandangan yang saling bertentangan tersebut. (in)
- Rational choice (also termed rationalism) is a prominent framework in international relations scholarship. Rational choice is not a substantive theory of international politics, but rather a methodological approach that focuses on certain types of social explanation for phenomena. In that sense, it is similar to constructivism, and differs from liberalism and realism, which are substantive theories of world politics. Rationalist analyses have been used to substantiate realist theories, as well as liberal theories of international relations. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
has abstract
| - غالبًا ما يُنظر إلى العقلانية في السياسة على أنها نقطة الوسط بين وجهتي نظر سياسيتين رئيسيتين، الواقعية والأممية. تميل العقلانية إلى اتباع حل وسط في معظم القضايا، وتجد حلًا وسطًا أيضًا بين وجهتي النظر المتضاربتين السابقتين، وذلك في الوقت الذي تترنح فيه حلول الواقعية والأممية على الجانبين. (ar)
- Rational choice (also termed rationalism) is a prominent framework in international relations scholarship. Rational choice is not a substantive theory of international politics, but rather a methodological approach that focuses on certain types of social explanation for phenomena. In that sense, it is similar to constructivism, and differs from liberalism and realism, which are substantive theories of world politics. Rationalist analyses have been used to substantiate realist theories, as well as liberal theories of international relations. Rational choice research tends to explain conditions that bring about outcomes or patterns of behavior if relevant actors behave rationally. Key concepts in rational choice research in international relations include incomplete information, credibility, signaling, transaction costs, trust, and audience costs. (en)
- Rasionalisme dalam politik sering dipandang sebagai titik tengah di antara tiga pandangan politik utama, yaitu realisme, rasionalisme, dan internasionalisme. Bila diibaratkan timbangan, realisme dan internasionalisme ada di ujung timbangan, sedangkan rasionalisme ada di tengah hampir di sebagian besar permasalahan dan berusaha menjembatani dua pandangan yang saling bertentangan tersebut. (in)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is Wikipage disambiguates
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |