About: Russell v R

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Russell v R Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRussell_v_R&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Russell v R is a landmark Privy Council decision regarding the interpretation of the Constitution Act, 1867, and was one of the first cases explaining the nature of the peace, order and good government power in Canadian federalism. It expanded upon the jurisprudence that was previously discussed in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Russell c. La Reine (fr) Russell v R (en)
rdfs:comment	Russell c. La Reine est un arrêt de principe du Conseil privé rendu en 1882 concernant l'interprétation de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867. Il s'agit de l'une des premières affaires expliquant la nature de la clause paix, ordre et bon gouvernement dans le fédéralisme canadien. Il a développé la jurisprudence dont il avait déjà été question dans l'arrêt Citizens Insurance Co of Canada c. Parsons. (fr) Russell v R is a landmark Privy Council decision regarding the interpretation of the Constitution Act, 1867, and was one of the first cases explaining the nature of the peace, order and good government power in Canadian federalism. It expanded upon the jurisprudence that was previously discussed in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons. (en)
name	Russell v R (en)
dcterms:subject	1882 in Canadian case law Canadian constitutional case law Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Canada Alcohol law in Canada
Wikipage page ID	3208344 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1080294450 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Canada Temperance Act Canadian federalism 1882 in Canadian case law Barnes Peacock Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Richard Couch (judge) Robert Collier, 1st Baron Monkswell Peace, order and good government Constitution Act, 1867 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Canada Temperance Federation Montague Edward Smith Section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867 Hodge v. The Queen Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons James Hannen, Baron Hannen Parliament of Canada Fredericton, New Brunswick List of Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases Canadian constitutional case law Intra vires Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Canada Alcohol law in Canada Supreme Court of Canada Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 Supreme Court of New Brunswick
sameAs	Russell v R Russell v R Russell v R Russell v R
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Italic_title dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:Quotation dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_court_case
citations	[1882] UKPC 33, [1882] 7 AC 829 (en)
court	Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
full name	Charles Russell v The Queen (en)
judges	Barnes Peacock Richard Couch (judge) Robert Collier, 1st Baron Monkswell Montague Edward Smith James Hannen, Baron Hannen
keywords	temperance, peace, order and good government, constitutional interpretation (en)
has abstract	Russell c. La Reine est un arrêt de principe du Conseil privé rendu en 1882 concernant l'interprétation de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867. Il s'agit de l'une des premières affaires expliquant la nature de la clause paix, ordre et bon gouvernement dans le fédéralisme canadien. Il a développé la jurisprudence dont il avait déjà été question dans l'arrêt Citizens Insurance Co of Canada c. Parsons. (fr) Russell v R is a landmark Privy Council decision regarding the interpretation of the Constitution Act, 1867, and was one of the first cases explaining the nature of the peace, order and good government power in Canadian federalism. It expanded upon the jurisprudence that was previously discussed in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons. (en)
appealed from	Supreme Court of New Brunswick
date decided	1882-06-23 (xsd:date)
decision by	Montague Edward Smith
number of judges	5 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Russell_v_R?oldid=1080294450&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6131 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Russell_v_R
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of New Brunswick case law Russell v. The Queen
is Wikipage redirect of	Russell v. The Queen
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Russell_v_R

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 55 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software