Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission, 492 U.S. 115 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the definition of "indecent material" and whether it is protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court invalidated part of a federal law that prohibited "dial-a-porn" telephone messaging services by making it a crime to transmit commercial telephone messages that were either "obscene" or "indecent".
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - セーブル・コミュニケーションズ・オブ・カリフォルニア対FCC事件 (ja)
- Sable Communications of California v. FCC (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission, 492 U.S. 115 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the definition of "indecent material" and whether it is protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court invalidated part of a federal law that prohibited "dial-a-porn" telephone messaging services by making it a crime to transmit commercial telephone messages that were either "obscene" or "indecent". (en)
- セーブル・コミュニケーションズ・オブ・カリフォルニア対FCC事件(セーブルコミュニケーションズオブカリフォルニアたいえふしーしーじけん、Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission)492 U.S. 115 (1989)は、アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所により、「いかがわしい素材」をどのように定義するかという問題と、それがアメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条で保護されるのかどうかが問われた事件。最高裁は、「いかがわしい」(indecent)に属するメッセージを商業的に電話で送信することを犯罪として、「ダイアル・ポルノ」を禁止していた連邦法の一部を無効にした。 (ja)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| - unanimous ; Rehnquist, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Sable Communications of California v. FCC, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - Since the First Amendment does not protect obscene speech, the ban was legitimate. However, sexual expression that is simply indecent is protected. Therefore, banning adult access to indecent messages "far exceeds that which is necessary" to shield minors from dial-a-porn services. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission, 492 U.S. 115 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the definition of "indecent material" and whether it is protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court invalidated part of a federal law that prohibited "dial-a-porn" telephone messaging services by making it a crime to transmit commercial telephone messages that were either "obscene" or "indecent". (en)
- セーブル・コミュニケーションズ・オブ・カリフォルニア対FCC事件(セーブルコミュニケーションズオブカリフォルニアたいえふしーしーじけん、Sable Communications of California v. Federal Communications Commission)492 U.S. 115 (1989)は、アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所により、「いかがわしい素材」をどのように定義するかという問題と、それがアメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条で保護されるのかどうかが問われた事件。最高裁は、「いかがわしい」(indecent)に属するメッセージを商業的に電話で送信することを犯罪として、「ダイアル・ポルノ」を禁止していた連邦法の一部を無効にした。 (ja)
|
Concurrence
| |
Concurrence/Dissent
| |
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |