• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Schabir Shaik trial     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Action100037396yago:Choice100161243yago:Decision100162632yago:Event100029378yago:Gossip107223170yago:Informing107212190yago:Move100165942yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Report107217924yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Scandal107223811yago:SpeechAct107160883yago:WikicatPoliticalScandalsInSouthAfricayago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Schabir Shaik trial was an important court trial in post-apartheid South Africa. The case, tried in the Durban and Coast Local Division of the High Court before Judge Hilary Squires, proved the fraudulent and corrupt relationship between Durban-based businessman Schabir Shaik and former South African leader Jacob Zuma. Shaik then attempted an appeal at the Supreme Court of Appeal. However, all five judges under President Craig Howie unanimously rejected his appeal, and agreed the correct sentence had been given over a year prior.