About: Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Place, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FSociété_des_Acadiens_v_Association_of_Parents&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on minority language rights under section 19(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The majority of the Court held that in civil cases in the New Brunswick courts, the parties have the right to use either French or English in all submissions and pleadings. However, they do not have a right to have the matter heard by a judge who understands them in the language they choose to speak. It is sufficient if there is simultaneous translation. In addition to the majority decision, two other justices of the Court held that the parties did have the right to be heard and understood by the judge in the language of their choice, but on the facts of the case, that standard was met.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Société des Acadiens c. Association of Parents (fr)
  • Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on minority language rights under section 19(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The majority of the Court held that in civil cases in the New Brunswick courts, the parties have the right to use either French or English in all submissions and pleadings. However, they do not have a right to have the matter heard by a judge who understands them in the language they choose to speak. It is sufficient if there is simultaneous translation. In addition to the majority decision, two other justices of the Court held that the parties did have the right to be heard and understood by the judge in the language of their choice, but on the facts of the case, that standard was met. (en)
  • Société des Acadiens c. Association of Parents est une décision historique de la Cour suprême du Canada sur les droits linguistiques de la minorité en vertu de l'article 19 (2) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. La majorité de la Cour a statué que dans les affaires civiles devant les tribunaux du Nouveau-Brunswick, les parties ont le droit d'utiliser le français ou l'anglais dans toutes les observations et plaidoiries. (fr)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
JoinMajority
  • Estey, Chouinard, Lamer and Le Dain (en)
LawsApplied
  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss 16, 19 (en)
citations
  • [1986] 1 SCR 549 (en)
majority
  • Beetz (en)
has abstract
  • Société des Acadiens c. Association of Parents est une décision historique de la Cour suprême du Canada sur les droits linguistiques de la minorité en vertu de l'article 19 (2) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. La majorité de la Cour a statué que dans les affaires civiles devant les tribunaux du Nouveau-Brunswick, les parties ont le droit d'utiliser le français ou l'anglais dans toutes les observations et plaidoiries. Cependant, elles n'ont pas le droit de faire entendre l'affaire par un juge qui les comprend dans la langue qu'ils choisissent de parler. Il suffit qu'il y ait une traduction simultanée. En plus de la décision majoritaire, deux autres juges de la Cour ont statué que les parties avaient le droit d'être entendues et comprises par le juge dans la langue de leur choix, mais d'après les faits de la cause, cette norme était respectée. (fr)
  • Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on minority language rights under section 19(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The majority of the Court held that in civil cases in the New Brunswick courts, the parties have the right to use either French or English in all submissions and pleadings. However, they do not have a right to have the matter heard by a judge who understands them in the language they choose to speak. It is sufficient if there is simultaneous translation. In addition to the majority decision, two other justices of the Court held that the parties did have the right to be heard and understood by the judge in the language of their choice, but on the facts of the case, that standard was met. (en)
case-name
  • Société des Acadiens v Association of Parents (en)
Concurrence
  • Wilson (en)
  • Dickson (en)
decided-date
full-case-name
  • Société des Acadiens du Nouveau‑Brunswick Inc. and the Association des conseillers scolaires francophones du Nouveau‑Brunswick v Association of Parents for Fairness in Education, Grand Falls District 50 Branch (en)
heard-date
NotParticipating
  • McIntyer and La Forest (en)
SCC
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software