Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the assertion that attempted monopolization may be proven merely by demonstration of unfair or predatory conduct. Instead, conduct of a single firm could be held to be unlawful attempted monopolization only when it actually monopolized or dangerously threatened to do so. Thus, the Court rejected the conclusion that injury to competition could be presumed to follow from certain conduct. The causal link must be demonstrated.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the assertion that attempted monopolization may be proven merely by demonstration of unfair or predatory conduct. Instead, conduct of a single firm could be held to be unlawful attempted monopolization only when it actually monopolized or dangerously threatened to do so. Thus, the Court rejected the conclusion that injury to competition could be presumed to follow from certain conduct. The causal link must be demonstrated. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- v. (en)
- Shirley McQuillan, et vir, DBA Sorboturf Enterprises (en)
- Spectrum Sports, Inc., et al (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| |
LawsApplied
| |
OralArgument
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - v. (en)
- Shirley McQuillan, et vir, DBA Sorboturf Enterprises (en)
- Spectrum Sports, Inc., et al (en)
|
Holding
| - Spectrum Sports may not be liable for attempted monopolization under ยง 2 absent proof of a dangerous probability that they would monopolize a relevant market and specific intent to monopolize. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the assertion that attempted monopolization may be proven merely by demonstration of unfair or predatory conduct. Instead, conduct of a single firm could be held to be unlawful attempted monopolization only when it actually monopolized or dangerously threatened to do so. Thus, the Court rejected the conclusion that injury to competition could be presumed to follow from certain conduct. The causal link must be demonstrated. (en)
|
googlescholar
| |
openjurist
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |