About: Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FSurrey_CC_v_Bredero_Homes_Ltd&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd. [1993] 3 All ER 705 is an English legal case relating to damages, in which two English councils, Surrey County Council and Mole Valley District Council, owned adjoining parcels of land. They sold the land in 1981 to developer Bredero Homes, subject to development covenants which stipulated conditions applicable to the development. The developer obtained planning permission subject to differing conditions, which allowed them to build more houses than the Councils' covenants would have permitted.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd. [1993] 3 All ER 705 is an English legal case relating to damages, in which two English councils, Surrey County Council and Mole Valley District Council, owned adjoining parcels of land. They sold the land in 1981 to developer Bredero Homes, subject to development covenants which stipulated conditions applicable to the development. The developer obtained planning permission subject to differing conditions, which allowed them to build more houses than the Councils' covenants would have permitted. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
has abstract
  • Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Ltd. [1993] 3 All ER 705 is an English legal case relating to damages, in which two English councils, Surrey County Council and Mole Valley District Council, owned adjoining parcels of land. They sold the land in 1981 to developer Bredero Homes, subject to development covenants which stipulated conditions applicable to the development. The developer obtained planning permission subject to differing conditions, which allowed them to build more houses than the Councils' covenants would have permitted. If the Councils had sold the land with the potential for more housing to be developed, they would have been able to charge more for the land. However, the legal rule that damages at common law pertain to the loss incurred by the injured party when a defendant has breached a contract was upheld, and as the Councils had suffered no loss their damages were only nominal, just £2. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software