• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: The Gospel According to Jesus Christ     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat1991Books, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingbibo:Bookschema:Bookschema:CreativeWorkworkText (literary theory)wikidata:Q386724Bookyago:WikicatBooksCriticalOfChristianityyago:WikicatBooksCriticalOfReligionyago:WikicatWorksByJoséSaramagoyago:Artifact100021939yago:Book106410904yago:Creation103129123yago:EndProduct103287178yago:Object100002684yago:Oeuvre103841417yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Product104007894yago:Publication106589574yago:Work104599396bookwritten workyago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat1991Books New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Gospel According to Jesus Christ (original title: O Evangelho Segundo Jesus Cristo, 1991) is a novel by the Portuguese author José Saramago. It is a fictional re-telling of Jesus Christ's life, depicting him as a flawed, humanised character with passions and doubts. The novel proved controversial, especially among the Roman Catholic Church, accusing Saramago of having a "substantially anti-religious vision". It was praised by other critics as a "deeply philosophical, provocative and compelling work".