Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
docket
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
Prior
| - *Summary judgment granted, Torres v. Madrid, No. 1:16-cv-01163, 2018 WL 4148405
*Affirmed, 769 F. App'x 654
*Cert. granted, 140 S. Ct. 680 (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - The application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case based on what constitutes a "seizure" in the context of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in the immediate case, in the situation where law enforcement had attempted to use physical force to stop a suspect but failed to do so. The Court ruled in a 5–3 decision that the use of physical force with the intent to restrain a person, even if that fails to restrain the person, is considered a seizure. (en)
|
NotParticipating
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |