TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of trademark law, holding that a functional design could not be trademarked, and that a patented design was presumed to be functional.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of trademark law, holding that a functional design could not be trademarked, and that a patented design was presumed to be functional. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- TrafFix Devices, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Marketing Displays, Incorporated (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - TrafFix Devices, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Marketing Displays, Incorporated (en)
|
Holding
| - There can be no trademark protection for something that is functional. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of trademark law, holding that a functional design could not be trademarked, and that a patented design was presumed to be functional. (en)
|
cornell
| |
googlescholar
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |