About: United States v. Cotterman

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: United States v. Cotterman Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FUnited_States_v._Cotterman&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

United States v. Cotterman, (9th Cir. en banc 2013), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that property, such as a laptop and other electronic storage devices, presented for inspection when entering the United States at the border may not be subject to forensic examination without a reason for suspicion, a holding that weakened the border search exception of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	United States v. Cotterman (en)
rdfs:comment	United States v. Cotterman, (9th Cir. en banc 2013), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that property, such as a laptop and other electronic storage devices, presented for inspection when entering the United States at the border may not be subject to forensic examination without a reason for suspicion, a holding that weakened the border search exception of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
name	United States v. Cotterman (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	2011 in United States case law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases United States Fourth Amendment case law Digital forensics
Wikipage page ID	34930503 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1088876608 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	2011 in United States case law Ronald M. Gould En banc Milan D. Smith, Jr. Border search exception Richard C. Tallman United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the District of Arizona United States Marshals Service United States Supreme Court Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution Child pornography Morgan Christen Contraband Lukeville, Arizona M. Margaret McKeown Computer forensics Password United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases Tucson, Arizona U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Westlaw Alex Kozinski Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Reasonable suspicion TECS United States Fourth Amendment case law Kim McLane Wardlaw Laptops Supreme Court of the United States Sydney Digital forensics Mary H. Murguia Port of entry Consuelo M. Callahan In re Boucher Mexico Raymond C. Fisher Sells, Arizona Search and seizure United States district court Digital cameras Raner C. Collins Motion to suppress United States v. Arnold Sidney Runyan Thomas Writ of Certiorari Betty Fletcher Forensic examination Richard R. Clifton
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-to-judge-computer-searches-at.html http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0912childpornarrest0912.html
sameAs	United States v. Cotterman United States v. Cotterman United States v. Cotterman
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Blockquote dbt:Good_article dbt:R dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
citations	Docket No. 09-10139 (en)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
judges	Kozinski, C.J, Thomas, McKeown, Wardlaw, Fisher, Gould, Clifton, Callahan, Smith Jr., Murguia, Christen, Cir. Js. (en)
keywords	Border search exception Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Reasonable suspicion Search and seizure Motion to suppress
has abstract	United States v. Cotterman, (9th Cir. en banc 2013), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that property, such as a laptop and other electronic storage devices, presented for inspection when entering the United States at the border may not be subject to forensic examination without a reason for suspicion, a holding that weakened the border search exception of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
appealed to	Supreme Court of the United States
date decided	2013-03-08 (xsd:date)
opinions	Reasonable suspicion is required to subject a computer seized at the border to forensic examination. (en)
prior actions	25920.0 (second)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Cotterman?oldid=1088876608&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	17283 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Cotterman
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Border search exception Operation Angel Watch House v. Napolitano Reasonable suspicion United States v. Arnold

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software