About: Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWalker_Process_Equipment%2C_Inc._v._Food_Machinery_%26_Chemical_Corp.&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), was a 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held, for the first time, that enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (en)
rdfs:comment	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), was a 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held, for the first time, that enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	United States Supreme Court cases Water supply and sanitation in the United States United States antitrust law United States patent case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court 1965 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	47511544 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	895904902 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	F.2d Monsanto Co. v. Rohm and Haas Co. United States Supreme Court cases Water supply and sanitation in the United States Tom C. Clark 7th Cir. United States antitrust law United States patent case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court 1965 in United States case law John Marshall Harlan II L. Ed. 2d Sewage treatment U.S.P.Q. U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/382/172/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_13/argument https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/13 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep382/usrep382172/usrep382172.pdf
sameAs	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc dbt:BBstyle
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Tom_C._Clark.gif?width=300
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
LawsApplied	; (en)
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_13/argument
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/13
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	17280.0 (second)
USPage	172 (xsd:integer)
USVol	382 (xsd:integer)
ArgueYear	1965 (xsd:integer)
case	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., (en)
DecideDate	0001-12-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1965 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (en)
Holding	That enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/382/172/
Litigants	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (en)
majority	Clark (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep382/usrep382172/usrep382172.pdf
has abstract	Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), was a 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held, for the first time, that enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect. (en)
ArgueDateA	0001-10-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueDateB	13 (xsd:integer)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Walker_Process_Equipment,_Inc._v._Food_Machinery_&_Chemical_Corp.?oldid=895904902&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	20507 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Walker_Process_Equipment,_Inc._v._Food_Machinery_&_Chemical_Corp.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	United States antitrust law United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. 382 U.S. 172 Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Walker Process v. FMC Walker Process v. Food Mach. & Chem. Walker Process v. Food Machinery
is Wikipage redirect of	382 U.S. 172 Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Walker Process v. FMC Walker Process v. Food Mach. & Chem. Walker Process v. Food Machinery
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Walker_Process_Equipment,_Inc._v._Food_Machinery_&_Chemical_Corp.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git145 as of Aug 30 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software