Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653 (1979), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in a land dispute, 25 U.S.C. § 194 applied only to individuals and not a state, that federal law governed the tribe's right to possession, but that state law was to be used in determining how that applied to the natural movement of a river's boundaries.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Wilson v. Omaha Tribe (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653 (1979), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in a land dispute, 25 U.S.C. § 194 applied only to individuals and not a state, that federal law governed the tribe's right to possession, but that state law was to be used in determining how that applied to the natural movement of a river's boundaries. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Wilson, et al. v. Omaha Indian Tribe, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| - Burger, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Wilson, et al. v. Omaha Indian Tribe, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - Vacated and remanded, held that in a land dispute, 25 U.S.C. § 194 applied only to individuals and not a state, that federal law governed the tribe's right to possession, but that state law was to be used in determining how that applied to the natural movement of a river's boundaries. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Wilson v. Omaha Tribe (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653 (1979), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in a land dispute, 25 U.S.C. § 194 applied only to individuals and not a state, that federal law governed the tribe's right to possession, but that state law was to be used in determining how that applied to the natural movement of a river's boundaries. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
googlescholar
| |
JoinConcurrence
| |
NotParticipating
| |