About: Woolmington v DPP

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Woolmington v DPP Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Building, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWoolmington_v_DPP&invfp=IFP_OFF&sas=SAME_AS_OFF

Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 is a landmark House of Lords case, where the presumption of innocence was re-consolidated (for application across the Commonwealth). In criminal law the case identifies the metaphorical "golden thread" running through that domain of the presumption of innocence.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity building
rdfs:label	Woolmington v. DPP (fr) Woolmington v DPP (en)
rdfs:comment	Dans le droit pénal des pays de common law, la décision Woolmington v. DPP est un arrêt de principe rendu par la Chambre des lords en 1935, où la notion historique de présomption d'innocence du droit anglais a été reformulée de manière à établir un fardeau de preuve hors de tout doute raisonnable applicable dans l'ensemble des pays du Commonwealth En droit pénal, cette affaire énonce la métaphore du « fil d'or » qui court à travers ce domaine de la présomption d'innocence. (fr) Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 is a landmark House of Lords case, where the presumption of innocence was re-consolidated (for application across the Commonwealth). In criminal law the case identifies the metaphorical "golden thread" running through that domain of the presumption of innocence. (en)
name	Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions (en)
dcterms:subject	1935 in British law English criminal case law House of Lords cases 1935 in case law
Wikipage page ID	1575886 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1121895139 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Castleton, Dorset Queen's Counsel Robert Wright, Baron Wright Sawed-off shotgun Barnardo's House of Lords John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey Rigby Swift 1935 in British law Double-barreled shotgun Presumption of innocence Commonwealth of Nations Gordon Hewart, 1st Viscount Hewart Murder in English law Thomas Inskip, 1st Viscount Caldecote Thomas Tomlin, Baron Tomlin Horace Avory BAILII John Cyril Smith Foster's Crown Law Judicial functions of the House of Lords James Atkin, Baron Atkin Court of Criminal Appeal (Scotland) Attorney General for England and Wales English criminal case law House of Lords cases Jersey Assizes 1935 in case law Fiat justitia Rayner Goddard, Baron Goddard World War II Malice aforethought Criminal Appeal Act 1907 dbr:Criminal_Evidence_Act_1898
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.justis.com/titles/iclr_s3540029.html
sameAs	Woolmington v DPP Woolmington v DPP Woolmington v DPP Woolmington v DPP
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_bailii dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_court_case
citations	25 (xsd:integer) [1935] AC 462 (en) [1935] UKHL 1 (en)
court	Judicial functions of the House of Lords
full name	Reginald Woolmington v Director for Public Prosecutions (en)
judges	Robert Wright, Baron Wright John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey Gordon Hewart, 1st Viscount Hewart Thomas Tomlin, Baron Tomlin James Atkin, Baron Atkin
keywords	Murder (en) (en) Burden of proof in crime (en) Intention and evidence of possible accident (en) Jury directions (en)
has abstract	Dans le droit pénal des pays de common law, la décision Woolmington v. DPP est un arrêt de principe rendu par la Chambre des lords en 1935, où la notion historique de présomption d'innocence du droit anglais a été reformulée de manière à établir un fardeau de preuve hors de tout doute raisonnable applicable dans l'ensemble des pays du Commonwealth En droit pénal, cette affaire énonce la métaphore du « fil d'or » qui court à travers ce domaine de la présomption d'innocence. (fr) Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 is a landmark House of Lords case, where the presumption of innocence was re-consolidated (for application across the Commonwealth). In criminal law the case identifies the metaphorical "golden thread" running through that domain of the presumption of innocence. (en)
date decided	1935-05-23 (xsd:date)
Legislation cited	dbr:Criminal_Evidence_Act_1898 Criminal Appeal Act 1907 s. 1 (en) Criminal Appeal Act 1907 s. 4 (en)
gold:hypernym	House
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Woolmington_v_DPP?oldid=1121895139&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10225 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Woolmington_v_DPP
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	English criminal law John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey List of landmark United Kingdom House of Lords cases Presumption of innocence 1935 in the United Kingdom William Finlay, 2nd Viscount Finlay Foster's Crown Law James Atkin, Baron Atkin Human rights in Hong Kong Human rights in the United Kingdom Violet Kathleen Woolmington

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 62 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software