On January 26, 1999, the European Community (EC) and its Member States requested consultation with the United States concerning a dispute over discrepancies between the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement) and Section 110(5) of the United States Copyright Act amended by the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. The dispute was over the legality of "the playing of radio and television music in public places (such as bars, shops, restaurants etc.) without the payment of a royalty fee" (World). The disputed parties worked through the existing process of WTO Dispute Settlement. First the EC lodged a complaint against the US with the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and requested consultation over the dispute. Then the parties requested a panel leadin
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - نزاع منظمة التجارة العالمية 160 (ar)
- Painel DS160 da Organização Mundial do Comércio (pt)
- World Trade Organization Dispute 160 (en)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - O caso WT/DS 160 foi uma disputa instaurada no Órgão de Solução de Controvérsias (OSC) da Organização Mundial de Comércio (OMC) iniciou-se em 1999. A Comunidade Europeia começou a disputa contra os Estados Unidos, alegando que a legislação americana de propriedade intelectual, mais especificamente de direitos autorais (US Copyright Act), violava o Tratado Internacional de Proteção de Propriedade Intelectual (TRIPS) e a Convenção de Berna, dois tratados internacionais. O Painel formado para decidir a questão entendeu que havia violação por parte dos Estados Unidos e que o país deveria alterar sua legislação. No entanto, embora os países tenham indicado ao órgão que chegaram a um acordo de mútua satisfação, até hoje, os Estados Unidos não implementaram a decisão. (pt)
- في السادس والعشرين من يناير (كانون الثاني) ١٩٩٩، طلب الاتحاد الأوروبي (EC) والدول الأعضاء فيه التشاور مع الولايات المتحدة بشأن الخلاف حول التباينات بين منظمة التجارة العالمية (WTO) بشأن اتفاقية الجوانب التجارية لحقوق الملكية الفكرية (TRIPs Agreement) وبين البند العاشر بعد المائة (الخامس) من قانون حق المؤلف الأمريكي المعدل بموجب قانون الإنصاف في ترخيص الموسيقى. كان الخلاف حول مشروعية «تشغيل موسيقى المذياع والتلفاز في الأماكن العامة (كالحانات والمتاجر والمطاعم وما إلى ذلك) دون دفع رسوم الملكية مقابل تشغيلها». جاهدت الأطراف المتنازعة من خلال العملية الحالية لغرض تسوية المنازعات في منظمة التجارة العالمية وفق التالي: (ar)
- On January 26, 1999, the European Community (EC) and its Member States requested consultation with the United States concerning a dispute over discrepancies between the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement) and Section 110(5) of the United States Copyright Act amended by the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. The dispute was over the legality of "the playing of radio and television music in public places (such as bars, shops, restaurants etc.) without the payment of a royalty fee" (World). The disputed parties worked through the existing process of WTO Dispute Settlement. First the EC lodged a complaint against the US with the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and requested consultation over the dispute. Then the parties requested a panel leadin (en)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| date
| |
| reason
| - Website citation needs a URL! (en)
|
| url
| |
| has abstract
| - في السادس والعشرين من يناير (كانون الثاني) ١٩٩٩، طلب الاتحاد الأوروبي (EC) والدول الأعضاء فيه التشاور مع الولايات المتحدة بشأن الخلاف حول التباينات بين منظمة التجارة العالمية (WTO) بشأن اتفاقية الجوانب التجارية لحقوق الملكية الفكرية (TRIPs Agreement) وبين البند العاشر بعد المائة (الخامس) من قانون حق المؤلف الأمريكي المعدل بموجب قانون الإنصاف في ترخيص الموسيقى. كان الخلاف حول مشروعية «تشغيل موسيقى المذياع والتلفاز في الأماكن العامة (كالحانات والمتاجر والمطاعم وما إلى ذلك) دون دفع رسوم الملكية مقابل تشغيلها». جاهدت الأطراف المتنازعة من خلال العملية الحالية لغرض تسوية المنازعات في منظمة التجارة العالمية وفق التالي: أولًا: رفعت المفوضية الأوروبية شكوى ضد الولايات المتحدة إلى هيئة تسوية المنازعات (DSP) طلب التشاور بشأن النزاع. ثانيًا: طلبت الأطراف المعنية إنشاء لجنة تفضي إلى تشكيل هيئة في الختام، يتبعها تعميم تقرير الهيئة. قبل كل من الأطراف المعنية تقرير الهيئة دون حق الاستئناف وانتهى النزاع بالتحكيم بشأن تنفيذ توصيات الهيئة. عملت كل من أستراليا والبرازيل وكندا واليابان وسويسرا كأطراف ثالثة في هذا النزاع. (ar)
- On January 26, 1999, the European Community (EC) and its Member States requested consultation with the United States concerning a dispute over discrepancies between the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement) and Section 110(5) of the United States Copyright Act amended by the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. The dispute was over the legality of "the playing of radio and television music in public places (such as bars, shops, restaurants etc.) without the payment of a royalty fee" (World). The disputed parties worked through the existing process of WTO Dispute Settlement. First the EC lodged a complaint against the US with the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and requested consultation over the dispute. Then the parties requested a panel leading to the body's eventual formation, followed by the circulation of the panel report. The parties accepted the Panel Report without appeal and the dispute ended in arbitration over implementation of the panel's recommendations. Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, and Switzerland acted as third parties in this dispute (World). (en)
- O caso WT/DS 160 foi uma disputa instaurada no Órgão de Solução de Controvérsias (OSC) da Organização Mundial de Comércio (OMC) iniciou-se em 1999. A Comunidade Europeia começou a disputa contra os Estados Unidos, alegando que a legislação americana de propriedade intelectual, mais especificamente de direitos autorais (US Copyright Act), violava o Tratado Internacional de Proteção de Propriedade Intelectual (TRIPS) e a Convenção de Berna, dois tratados internacionais. O Painel formado para decidir a questão entendeu que havia violação por parte dos Estados Unidos e que o país deveria alterar sua legislação. No entanto, embora os países tenham indicado ao órgão que chegaram a um acordo de mútua satisfação, até hoje, os Estados Unidos não implementaram a decisão. (pt)
|
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
| is Wikipage redirect
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)