About: Bates v. City of Little Rock     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBates_v._City_of_Little_Rock

Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
JoinMajority
  • unanimous court (en)
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. I and XIV (en)
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock, (en)
courtlistener
date
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al. (en)
Holding
  • State governments cannot compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists when it inhibits freedom of association. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock (en)
majority
  • Stewart (en)
title
  • First Amendment Library entry for Bates v. City of Little Rock (en)
url
loc
has abstract
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme. This was a companion case to NAACP v. Alabama (1958), which also held that NAACP membership records are protected by First Amendment freedom of association, and Talley v. California (1960), which held that Talley, a civil rights activist, could not be fined for an anonymous flyer. These cases help establish the right to privacy under the First Amendment, expanded on in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee (1982). (en)
Concurrence
  • Black and Douglas (en)
googlescholar
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software