Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a spouse that is not a participant an ERISA account cannot will part or all of it before distribution of the pension plan.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a spouse that is not a participant an ERISA account cannot will part or all of it before distribution of the pension plan. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs, and David B. Boggs (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| - O'Connor; Rehnquist, Ginsburg (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Thomas; Rehnquist, Ginsburg (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, et seq. (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs, and David B. Boggs (en)
|
Holding
| - ERISA pre-empts state community property law, when dealing with non-participating spouse and the right to will undistributed pensions. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a spouse that is not a participant an ERISA account cannot will part or all of it before distribution of the pension plan. (en)
|
cornell
| |
googlescholar
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |