About: Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBose_Corp._v._Consumers_Union_of_United_States%2C_Inc.

Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (1984), was a product disparagement case ultimately decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held, on a 6–3 vote, in favor of Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, ruling that proof of "actual malice" was necessary in product disparagement cases raising First Amendment issues, as set out by the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). The Court ruled that the First Circuit Court of Appeals had correctly concluded that Bose had not presented proof of actual malice.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (1984), was a product disparagement case ultimately decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held, on a 6–3 vote, in favor of Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, ruling that proof of "actual malice" was necessary in product disparagement cases raising First Amendment issues, as set out by the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). The Court ruled that the First Circuit Court of Appeals had correctly concluded that Bose had not presented proof of actual malice. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (en)
dcterms:subject	1984 in United States case law United States defamation case law United States Supreme Court cases Bose Corporation United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Consumer Reports
Wikipage page ID	13449559 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1109591902 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	F.2d Bose 901 Bose Corporation 1984 in United States case law United States defamation case law List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 466 United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts United States Supreme Court cases Consumer Reports Consumers Union Bose Corporation First Amendment to the United States Constitution De novo review Suzuki v. Consumers Union United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Consumer Reports New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Certiorari F. Supp.
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/82-1246 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/466/485.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/692/189/379689/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/508/134/1483391/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/466/485/ https://www.nytimes.com/1984/05/02/opinion/a-sound-affirmation-of-free-speech.html%7Cdate=2 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep466/usrep466485/usrep466485.pdf
sameAs	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_magazine dbt:Cite_news dbt:Clarify dbt:Convert dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Italic_title dbt:No_footnotes dbt:Ussc dbt:Lead_extra_info dbt:Bose dbt:US1stAmendment
Dissent	White (en) Rehnquist (en)
JoinDissent	O'Connor (en)
JoinMajority	Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell (en)
LawsApplied	First Amendment to the United States Constitution
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/82-1246
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	17280.0 (second)
USPage	485 (xsd:integer)
USVol	466 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-11-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1983 (xsd:integer)
case	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., (en)
DecideDate	0001-04-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1984 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/466/485.html
fullname	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (en)
Holding	Product disparagement cases that involve First Amendment claims are governed by the "actual malice" standard of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/466/485/
Litigants	Bose v. Consumers Union (en)
majority	Stevens (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep466/usrep466485/usrep466485.pdf
has abstract	Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (1984), was a product disparagement case ultimately decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held, on a 6–3 vote, in favor of Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, ruling that proof of "actual malice" was necessary in product disparagement cases raising First Amendment issues, as set out by the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). The Court ruled that the First Circuit Court of Appeals had correctly concluded that Bose had not presented proof of actual malice. The magazine Consumer Reports had published in 1970 a review of an unusual loudspeaker system manufactured by Bose Corporation, called the Bose 901. The review expressed skepticism of the system's quality and recommended that consumers delay purchase until they had investigated for themselves whether the loudspeaker system's unusual attributes would suit them. Bose objected to numerous statements in the article, including the sentences, "Worse, individual instruments heard through the Bose system seemed to grow to gigantic proportions and tended to wander about the room. For instance, a violin appeared to be 10 feet (3.0 m) wide and a piano stretched from wall to wall." Bose demanded a retraction when they learned that Consumer Reports changed what the original reviewer wrote about the speakers in his pre-publication draft, which the magazine refused to do. (en)
Concurrence	Burger (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Bose_Corp._v._Consumers_Union_of_United_States,_Inc.?oldid=1109591902&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	5250 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Bose_Corp._v._Consumers_Union_of_United_States,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment Bose Corporation

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software