About: Burnham v. Superior Court of California

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Burnham v. Superior Court of California Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBurnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California

Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine justices unanimously agreed that this basis for personal jurisdiction—known as "transient jurisdiction"—is constitutionally permissible. However, the Court failed to produce a majority opinion, as the members were sharply divided on the reasons for the decision, reflecting two fundamentally different approaches to how due-process issues are to be analyzed. Justice Scalia wrote the lead opinion, joined in whole or part by three other Justices. Justice

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Burnham v. Superior Court of California (en)
rdfs:comment	Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine justices unanimously agreed that this basis for personal jurisdiction—known as "transient jurisdiction"—is constitutionally permissible. However, the Court failed to produce a majority opinion, as the members were sharply divided on the reasons for the decision, reflecting two fundamentally different approaches to how due-process issues are to be analyzed. Justice Scalia wrote the lead opinion, joined in whole or part by three other Justices. Justice (en)
foaf:name	Dennis Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin (en)
dcterms:subject	1990 in United States case law 1990 in California United States Supreme Court cases Legal history of California United States due process case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court United States personal jurisdiction case law Due Process Clause
Wikipage page ID	20033977 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1056395759 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Supreme Court 1990 in United States case law Sandra Day O'Connor Byron R. White Appearance (law) John Paul Stevens List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 495 List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court Pennoyer v. Neff California courts of appeal Due Process Clause 1990 in California United States Supreme Court cases William J. Brennan, Jr. Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia Personal jurisdiction Summons Legal history of California United States due process case law Thurgood Marshall William H. Rehnquist Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Forum non conveniens United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Harry Blackmun International Shoe Co. v. Washington L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States United States personal jurisdiction case law Due Process Clause Certiorari Shaffer v. Heitner In personam Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume Writ of mandate (California) Oyez Project Service (law) In rem
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://web.archive.org/web/20090603013223/http:/www.lawnix.com/cases/burnham-superior-court.html https://web.archive.org/web/20110718090751/http:/www.law.pace.edu/dld/CivPro1_Materials/Burnham_Case.pdf https://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_89_44
sameAs	Burnham v. Superior Court of California Burnham v. Superior Court of California Burnham v. Superior Court of California Burnham v. Superior Court of California
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
LawsApplied	Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	Writ of certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District (en)
USPage	604 (xsd:integer)
USVol	495 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-02-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1990 (xsd:integer)
DecideDate	0001-05-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1990 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Dennis Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin (en)
Holding	Personal jurisdiction can be exercised over a nonresident who was personally served with process while temporarily in that State, in a suit unrelated to his activities in the State. (en)
Litigants	Burnham v. Superior Court of California (en)
has abstract	Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state. All nine justices unanimously agreed that this basis for personal jurisdiction—known as "transient jurisdiction"—is constitutionally permissible. However, the Court failed to produce a majority opinion, as the members were sharply divided on the reasons for the decision, reflecting two fundamentally different approaches to how due-process issues are to be analyzed. Justice Scalia wrote the lead opinion, joined in whole or part by three other Justices. Justice Brennan wrote an opinion joined by three other Justices. Justices White and Stevens wrote separate opinions. (en)
Concurrence	White (en) Stevens (en) Brennan (en)
JoinConcurrence	Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor (en)
JoinPlurality	Rehnquist, Kennedy; White (en)
Plurality	Scalia (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California?oldid=1056395759&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	12397 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Burnham_v._Superior_Court_of_California
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	California Courts of Appeal John Paul Stevens List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software