Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432 (1982), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld a state law as constitutional that excluded aliens from positions as probation officers. The Court found that probation officers fell within the political function exception to strict scrutiny equal protection analysis because probation officers exercise discretionary power involving a basic governmental function that gives them authority over the individual.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Cabell v. Chavez-Salido (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432 (1982), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld a state law as constitutional that excluded aliens from positions as probation officers. The Court found that probation officers fell within the political function exception to strict scrutiny equal protection analysis because probation officers exercise discretionary power involving a basic governmental function that gives them authority over the individual. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - Clarence E. Cabell, et al. v. Jose Chavez-Salido, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| - Brennan, Marshall, Stevens (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Clarence E. Cabell, et al. v. Jose Chavez-Salido, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - Laws excluding aliens from becoming probation officers are constitutional because they fall within the political function exception to the Equal Protection clause. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Cabell v. Chavez-Salido (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Cabell v. Chavez-Salido, 454 U.S. 432 (1982), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld a state law as constitutional that excluded aliens from positions as probation officers. The Court found that probation officers fell within the political function exception to strict scrutiny equal protection analysis because probation officers exercise discretionary power involving a basic governmental function that gives them authority over the individual. (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |