About: Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCapitol_Square_Review_%26_Advisory_Board_v._Pinette

Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case that focused on First Amendment rights and the Establishment Clause. Vincent Pinette, an active member of the Ku Klux Klan in Columbus, Ohio, wanted to place an unattended cross on the lawn of the Capitol Square during the 1993 Christmas season. Pinette and his fellow members of the KKK submitted their request. The advisory board originally denied this request. However, Pinette and the other members of the Ohio Chapter of the Klan fought this decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The court found in favor of the Klan and the Advisory Board issued the permit. The Board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decisio

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette (en)
rdfs:comment	Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case that focused on First Amendment rights and the Establishment Clause. Vincent Pinette, an active member of the Ku Klux Klan in Columbus, Ohio, wanted to place an unattended cross on the lawn of the Capitol Square during the 1993 Christmas season. Pinette and his fellow members of the KKK submitted their request. The advisory board originally denied this request. However, Pinette and the other members of the Ohio Chapter of the Klan fought this decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The court found in favor of the Klan and the Advisory Board issued the permit. The Board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decisio (en)
foaf:name	(en) Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, et al., Petitioners v. Vincent J. Pinette, Donnie A. Carr, and Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (en)
dcterms:subject	Ku Klux Klan United States Supreme Court cases 1995 in United States case law History of racism in Ohio United States Free Speech Clause case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Establishment Clause case law
Wikipage page ID	33442837 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1061811217 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Capitol Square Sandra Day O'Connor Endorsement test David Souter Ku Klux Klan John Paul Stevens United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio With God, all things are possible United States Supreme Court cases Columbus, Ohio Ruth Bader Ginsburg Establishment Clause Clarence Thomas Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia Lemon v. Kurtzman Lynch v. Donnelly 1995 in United States case law William Rehnquist 6th Cir. History of racism in Ohio United States Free Speech Clause case law First Amendment to the United States Constitution Endorsement Test United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Establishment Clause case law L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Ku Klux Klan First Amendment S.D. Ohio County of Allegheny v. ACLU Public forum F.3d F. Supp. U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/30/675/471686/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/844/1182/1523167/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=9510136217607691229 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/515/753/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/117966/capitol-squarereview-and-advisory-bd-v-pinette/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/515/753 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_780/argument https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/94-780 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep515/usrep515753/usrep515753.pdf
sameAs	Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US1stAmendment
Dissent	Stevens (en) Ginsburg (en)
JoinMajority	Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer (en)
LawsApplied	Establishment Clause First Amendment to the United States Constitution
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_780/argument
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/94-780
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	753 (xsd:integer)
USVol	515 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1995 (xsd:integer)
case	Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/117966/capitol-squarereview-and-advisory-bd-v-pinette/
DecideDate	0001-06-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1995 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, et al., Petitioners v. Vincent J. Pinette, Donnie A. Carr, and Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (en)
Holding	Religious expression does not violate the Establishment Clause when it is completely private and takes place in a designated public forum. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/515/753/case.html
Litigants	Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette (en)
majority	Scalia (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep515/usrep515753/usrep515753.pdf
has abstract	Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case that focused on First Amendment rights and the Establishment Clause. Vincent Pinette, an active member of the Ku Klux Klan in Columbus, Ohio, wanted to place an unattended cross on the lawn of the Capitol Square during the 1993 Christmas season. Pinette and his fellow members of the KKK submitted their request. The advisory board originally denied this request. However, Pinette and the other members of the Ohio Chapter of the Klan fought this decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The court found in favor of the Klan and the Advisory Board issued the permit. The Board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the district court. The board made one last petition to the Supreme Court where the decision was made, by a vote of seven to two, that the Klan was permitted to display the cross at the public forum. (en)
Concurrence	Thomas (en) Souter (en) O'Connor (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software