About: City of London Building Society v Flegg     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCity_of_London_Building_Society_v_Flegg

City of London Building Society v Flegg [1987] UKHL 6 is an English land law case decided in the House of Lords on the relationship between potential overriding interests and the concept of overreaching.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • City of London Building Society v Flegg (en)
rdfs:comment
  • City of London Building Society v Flegg [1987] UKHL 6 is an English land law case decided in the House of Lords on the relationship between potential overriding interests and the concept of overreaching. (en)
name
  • City of London Building Society v Flegg (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Cemetery_entrance,_Grange_Rd_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1237180.jpg
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
citations
  • [1987] 3 All ER 435 (en)
  • [1987] UKHL 6 (en)
  • [1988] AC 54 (en)
court
  • House of Lords (en)
full name
  • City of London Building Society v Edgar E Flegg and Joan E Flegg and others (en)
keywords
  • Overreaching, overriding interest, actual occupation (en)
has abstract
  • City of London Building Society v Flegg [1987] UKHL 6 is an English land law case decided in the House of Lords on the relationship between potential overriding interests and the concept of overreaching. The case was controversial because it construed the statutory framework so that interests which might have been overriding were denied that status because they could be overreached in appropriate circumstances. In the following years, it has been questioned whether the overreaching rules, as interpreted by Flegg, are compatible with the qualified rights to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and/or the right to a family life and home guaranteed in the Convention on Human Rights. Currently it appears that they are. (en)
concurring
  • Lord Goff (en)
  • Lord Bridge (en)
  • Lord Mackay (en)
decision by
  • Lord Oliver (en)
  • Lord Templeman (en)
prior actions
  • Appellant lender lost in the Court of Appeal but earlier won before His Honour Judge Thomas whose order was restored. (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software