About: Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth)

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FColonial_Sugar_Refining_Co_Ltd_v_Attorney-General_%28Cth%29

Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth), is the only case in which the High Court issued a certificate under section 74 of the Constitution to permit an appeal to the Privy Council on a constitutional question. The Privy Council did not answer the question asked by the High Court, and the court never issued another certificate of appeal.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (en)
rdfs:comment	Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth), is the only case in which the High Court issued a certificate under section 74 of the Constitution to permit an appeal to the Privy Council on a constitutional question. The Privy Council did not answer the question asked by the High Court, and the court never issued another certificate of appeal. (en)
name	Attorney-General v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (en) Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1912 in Australian law 1912 in case law Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Australia High Court of Australia cases
Wikipage page ID	51868273 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100100340 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Royal Commission Samuel Griffith Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Richard Haldane, 1st Viscount Haldane Inter se Constitution of Australia Chief Justice of Australia Andrew Murray, 1st Viscount Dunedin Lord Chancellor Sugar refinery 1912 in Australian law Commonwealth Law Reports CSR Limited Edmund Barton 1912 in case law Parliament of Australia Parliament of the United Kingdom Thomas Shaw, 1st Baron Craigmyle List of High Court of Australia cases H. B. Higgins High Court of Australia Isaac Isaacs Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Australia High Court of Australia cases John Fletcher Moulton, Baron Moulton Sugar cane mill Australia Act 1986 Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) Royal Commissions Act 1902 Reserved powers doctrine List of Australian Royal Commissions Justices
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1912/94.pdf
sameAs	Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Abbr dbt:Clear_right dbt:Italic_title dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_Court_Case dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
citations	; (en)
court	Judicial Committee of the Privy Council High Court of Australia
imagesize	100 (xsd:integer)
italic title	no (en)
judges	Samuel Griffith Richard Haldane, 1st Viscount Haldane Chief Justice of Australia Andrew Murray, 1st Viscount Dunedin Lord Chancellor Edmund Barton Thomas Shaw, 1st Baron Craigmyle H. B. Higgins Isaac Isaacs John Fletcher Moulton, Baron Moulton Justices
has abstract	Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth), is the only case in which the High Court issued a certificate under section 74 of the Constitution to permit an appeal to the Privy Council on a constitutional question. The Privy Council did not answer the question asked by the High Court, and the court never issued another certificate of appeal. (en)
date decided	1912-10-22 (xsd:date) 1913-12-17 (xsd:date)
opinions	The Royal Commission Act was invalid (en) ' The Royal Commission Act was valid ' the Royal commission could only compel evidence on matters within the power of the Commonwealth (per Griffith CJ and Barton J) (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Colonial_Sugar_Refining_Co_Ltd_v_Attorney-General_(Cth)?oldid=1100100340&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	11592 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Colonial_Sugar_Refining_Co_Ltd_v_Attorney-General_(Cth)
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of High Court of Australia cases Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Colonial_Sugar_Refining_Co_Ltd_v_Attorney-General_(Cth)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software