About: Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FComputer_Associates_International%2C_Inc._v._Altai%2C_Inc.

Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992) is a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that addressed to what extent non-literal elements of software are protected by copyright law. The court used and recommended a three-step process called the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test. The case was an appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in which the district court found that defendant Altai's OSCAR 3.4 computer program had infringed plaintiff Computer Associates' copyrighted computer program entitled CA-SCHEDULER. The district court also found that Altai's OSCAR 3.5 program was not substantially similar to a portion of CA-SCHEDULER 7.0 called SYSTEM ADAPTER, and thus denied

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992) is a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that addressed to what extent non-literal elements of software are protected by copyright law. The court used and recommended a three-step process called the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test. The case was an appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in which the district court found that defendant Altai's OSCAR 3.4 computer program had infringed plaintiff Computer Associates' copyrighted computer program entitled CA-SCHEDULER. The district court also found that Altai's OSCAR 3.5 program was not substantially similar to a portion of CA-SCHEDULER 7.0 called SYSTEM ADAPTER, and thus denied (en)
name	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases United States lawsuits CA Technologies United States copyright case law 1992 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	3236273 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1032331521 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York VM/CMS United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases United States lawsuits Copyright infringement of software Analytic dissection Substantial similarity Frank Altimari George C. Pratt Copyright Copyright infringement Structure, sequence and organization Clean room design Public domain Baker v. Selden CA Technologies United States copyright case law 1992 in United States case law Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test Job scheduler Trade secret Whelan v. Jaslow Merger doctrine (copyright law) Operating system Macro (computer science) Pamela Samuelson Parameter (computer science) John M. Walker, Jr. Scenes a faire List of leading legal cases in copyright law DOS/VSE Computer Associates John Daniel Mahoney 17 U.S.C. OS/MVS dbr:Altai_(company)
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.fair-opinion.com/Current%20Issues.shtml http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0d229472 http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/int-prop/software-copyright.html%23Altai
sameAs	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:USCopyrightActs dbt:Infobox_court_case
ArgueDate	1992-01-09 (xsd:date)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
full name	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. (en)
Holding	The court applied the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison, three-step test to determine whether substantial similarity is met when proving copyright infringement for non-literal elements of software, and it held that Altai's rewritten code did not meet the requirements for copyright infringement, and vacated and remanded the ruling on trade secret misappropriation. (en)
judges	Frank Altimari, John Mahoney, and John Walker (en)
keywords	copyright infringement, non-literal elements, substantial similarity, abstraction-filtration-comparison (en)
has abstract	Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992) is a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that addressed to what extent non-literal elements of software are protected by copyright law. The court used and recommended a three-step process called the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test. The case was an appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in which the district court found that defendant Altai's OSCAR 3.4 computer program had infringed plaintiff Computer Associates' copyrighted computer program entitled CA-SCHEDULER. The district court also found that Altai's OSCAR 3.5 program was not substantially similar to a portion of CA-SCHEDULER 7.0 called SYSTEM ADAPTER, and thus denied relief as to OSCAR 3.5. Finally, the district court concluded that Computer Associates' state law trade secret misappropriation claim against Altai was preempted by the federal Copyright Act. The appeal was heard by Judges Frank Altimari, John Daniel Mahoney, and John M. Walker, Jr. The majority opinion was written by Judge Walker. Judge Altimari concurred in part and dissented in part. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling as to copyright infringement, but vacated and remanded its holding on trade secret preemption. (en)
date decided	0001-12-17 (xsd:gMonthDay) 1992-06-22 (xsd:date)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Computer_Associates_International,_Inc._v._Altai,_Inc.?oldid=1032331521&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	13747 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Computer_Associates_International,_Inc._v._Altai,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Intellectual property protection of video games Computer Associates Int'l, Inc. v. Altai Inc. Analytic dissection Substantial similarity Altai CA Technologies Scènes à faire Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc. Computer Associates Int'l Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates Int. Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates Int'l v. Altai Computer Associates v. Altai Computer Assocs. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai Inc.
is Wikipage redirect of	Computer Associates Int'l, Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates Int'l Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates Int. Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai Inc. Computer Associates Int'l v. Altai Computer Associates v. Altai Computer Assocs. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai Inc.
is Wikipage disambiguates of	Altai
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Computer_Associates_International,_Inc._v._Altai,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software