Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity is a 1989 book by the American philosopher Richard Rorty, based on two sets of lectures he gave at University College, London, and at Trinity College, Cambridge. In contrast to his earlier work, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Rorty mostly abandons attempts to explain his theories in analytical terms and instead creates an alternate conceptual schema to that of the "Platonists" he rejects. In this schema "truth" (as the term is used conventionally) is considered unintelligible and meaningless.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity is a 1989 book by the American philosopher Richard Rorty, based on two sets of lectures he gave at University College, London, and at Trinity College, Cambridge. In contrast to his earlier work, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Rorty mostly abandons attempts to explain his theories in analytical terms and instead creates an alternate conceptual schema to that of the "Platonists" he rejects. In this schema "truth" (as the term is used conventionally) is considered unintelligible and meaningless. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (en)
|
name
| - Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (en)
|
foaf:depiction
| |
dc:publisher
| - Cambridge University Press
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
thumbnail
| |
author
| |
border
| |
caption
| - Cover of the first edition (en)
|
congress
| |
country
| |
dewey
| |
isbn
| |
language
| |
media type
| |
pages
| |
pub date
| |
publisher
| |
subject
| |
has abstract
| - Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity is a 1989 book by the American philosopher Richard Rorty, based on two sets of lectures he gave at University College, London, and at Trinity College, Cambridge. In contrast to his earlier work, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Rorty mostly abandons attempts to explain his theories in analytical terms and instead creates an alternate conceptual schema to that of the "Platonists" he rejects. In this schema "truth" (as the term is used conventionally) is considered unintelligible and meaningless. The book is divided into three parts: "Contingency", "Ironism and Theory", and "Cruelty and Solidarity". (en)
|
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |