About: DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com

DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P., 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014), was the first United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of computer-implemented patent claims after the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Both Alice and DDR Holdings are legal decisions relevant to the debate about whether software and business methods are patentable subject matter under Title 35 of the United States Code §101. The Federal Circuit applied the framework articulated in Alice to uphold the validity of the patents on webpage display technology at issue in DDR Holdings.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com (en)
rdfs:comment	DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P., 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014), was the first United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of computer-implemented patent claims after the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Both Alice and DDR Holdings are legal decisions relevant to the debate about whether software and business methods are patentable subject matter under Title 35 of the United States Code §101. The Federal Circuit applied the framework articulated in Alice to uphold the validity of the patents on webpage display technology at issue in DDR Holdings. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	2015 in United States case law United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cases United States patent case law Software patent case law Expedia Group
Wikipage page ID	45544472 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1122509870 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	F. Supp. 2d Motion in United States law Bilski v. Kappos Hotels.com United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Utility (patent) Defendant Inventive step and non-obviousness Patent infringement Novelty (patent) Damages Appeal Sufficiency of disclosure Patentable subject matter Travelocity Lawsuit Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International 2015 in United States case law Evan Wallach Framing (World Wide Web) Judgment (law) Judgment as a matter of law HTML element Haldane Robert Mayer E.D. Tex. Ultramercial Software patents under United States patent law United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cases United States patent case law Software patent case law Jury trial Supreme Court of the United States Title 35 of the United States Code Digital River Business method patent Expedia (website) Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp. Orbitz Expedia Group Raymond T. Chen Settlement (litigation) Verdict Software patent Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc. U.S. App. LEXIS F.3d U.S.P.Q.2d
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings/2014-05-06/all/ddr-holdings.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/13-1505/13-1505-2014-12-05.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15961815186343228931 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2757944/ddr-holdings-llc-v-hotelscom-lp/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20141205156.xml https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20130621d23
sameAs	DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Course_assignment dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Smallcaps dbt:USC dbt:West
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/DDR_chart.jpg?width=300
Dissent	Mayer (en)
JoinMajority	Wallach (en)
OralArgument	http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings/2014-05-06/all/ddr-holdings.html
Prior	172800.0 (second)
ArgueDate	0001-05-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
case	25920.0 (second)
citations	17280.0 (second)
course	Education Program:University of California, Berkeley/Cyberlaw (en)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2757944/ddr-holdings-llc-v-hotelscom-lp/
DecideDate	0001-12-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
fullname	DDR Holdings, LLC, plaintiff-appellee v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al., defendants, and National Leisure Group, Inc. and World Travel Holdings, Inc., defendants-appellants (en)
Holding	Patents claims to a system that addressed a problem particular to Internet businesses by implementing unconventional computer processes were directed to patent eligible subject matter. (en)
judges	Senior Circuit Judge Haldane Robert Mayer, Circuit Judge Raymond T. Chen, and Circuit Judge Evan Wallach (en)
justia	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/13-1505/13-1505-2014-12-05.html
Litigants	DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com (en)
majority	Chen (en)
term	Spring 2015 (en)
has abstract	DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P., 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014), was the first United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of computer-implemented patent claims after the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Both Alice and DDR Holdings are legal decisions relevant to the debate about whether software and business methods are patentable subject matter under Title 35 of the United States Code §101. The Federal Circuit applied the framework articulated in Alice to uphold the validity of the patents on webpage display technology at issue in DDR Holdings. In Alice, the Supreme Court held that a computer implementation of an abstract idea, which is not itself eligible for a patent, does not by itself transform that idea into something that is patent eligible. According to the Supreme Court, in order to be patent eligible, what is claimed must be more than the abstract idea. The implementation of the idea must be something beyond the "routine," "conventional" or "generic." In DDR Holdings, the Federal Circuit, applying the Alice analytical framework, upheld the validity of DDR's patent on its webpage display technology. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15961815186343228931

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software