About: Delgamuukw v British Columbia

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Delgamuukw v British Columbia Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDelgamuukw_v_British_Columbia

Delgamuukw v British Columbia, [1997] 3 SCR 1010, also known as Delgamuukw v The Queen, Delgamuukw-Gisday’wa, or simply Delgamuukw, is a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada that contains its first comprehensive account of Aboriginal title (a distinct kind of Aboriginal right) in Canada. The Gitxsan and Wet’suwet’en peoples claimed Aboriginal title and jurisdiction over 58,000 square kilometers in northwest British Columbia. The plaintiffs lost the case at trial, but the Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal in part and ordered a new trial because of deficiencies relating to the pleadings and treatment of evidence. In this decision, the Court went on to describe the "nature and scope" of the protection given to Aboriginal title under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, defined

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Delgamuukw v British Columbia (en) Delgamuukw c. Colombie-Britannique (fr) デルガムーク対ブリティッシュ・コロンビア州 (ja) Delgamuukw × Colúmbia Britânica (pt)
rdfs:comment	Delgamuukw c. Colombie-Britannique ou Delgamuukw c. La Reine est une décision de la Cour suprême du Canada où la cour a spécifiquement refusé de faire une déclaration définitive sur la nature du titre ancestral autochtone au Canada. (fr) デルガムーク対ブリティッシュ・コロンビア州の訴訟 3 S.C.R. 1010 i（カナダでは、訴訟はX対Yの形で表される）は、カナダ先住民であるギッサン・ネイションおよびウェトスウェッテン・ネイションが、およそ54,000平方キロメートルの土地に対する権原の確認を求めて起こした訴訟である。ブリティッシュ・コロンビア州最高上訴裁判所（最高裁判所）による1997年の判決は、カナダにおけるの性質をめぐるもっとも決定的な言明として有名である。 (ja) Delgamuukw v British Columbia, [1997] 3 SCR 1010, also known as Delgamuukw v The Queen, Delgamuukw-Gisday’wa, or simply Delgamuukw, is a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada that contains its first comprehensive account of Aboriginal title (a distinct kind of Aboriginal right) in Canada. The Gitxsan and Wet’suwet’en peoples claimed Aboriginal title and jurisdiction over 58,000 square kilometers in northwest British Columbia. The plaintiffs lost the case at trial, but the Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal in part and ordered a new trial because of deficiencies relating to the pleadings and treatment of evidence. In this decision, the Court went on to describe the "nature and scope" of the protection given to Aboriginal title under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, defined (en)
dcterms:subject	Canadian Aboriginal case law First Nations history in British Columbia Gitxsan 1997 in Canadian case law Aboriginal title in Canada Wet'suwet'en Supreme Court of Canada cases History of human rights in Canada
Wikipage page ID	2396181 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1119307428 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Canada Procedures of the Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Aboriginal case law Beverley McLachlin Allan McEachern Peter Cory Vancouver Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia Office of the Hereditary Chiefs of the Wet'suwet'en First Nations history in British Columbia Gitxsan 1991 British Columbia general election Constitution Act, 1867 Oral tradition R v Gladstone R v Guerin R v Van der Peet 1997 in Canadian case law Claire L'Heureux-Dubé Gitxsan Constitution Act, 1982 2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests Antonio Lamer Calder v British Columbia (AG) Smithers, British Columbia Fee simple R v Sparrow Sui generis British Columbia Wetʼsuwetʼen Wetʼsuwetʼen First Nation Anglicisation Amici curiae British Columbia Court of Appeal Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources) Aboriginal title in Canada Gérard La Forest Wet'suwet'en Supreme Court of Canada cases Aboriginal land title in Canada Aboriginal title History of human rights in Canada John C. Major Supreme Court of Canada Coastal GasLink Pipeline Hereditary chiefs in Canada Alienation (property law) Obiter dicta Order of Canada Case citation Social Credit Party of British Columbia New Democratic Party of British Columbia Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 Gitxsan Nation Guerin v The Queen
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://sisis.nativeweb.org/clark/gitksan.html http://digitalcollections.library.ubc.ca/cdm/landingpage/collection/delgamuukw
sameAs	Delgamuukw v British Columbia Delgamuukw v British Columbia Delgamuukw v British Columbia Delgamuukw v British Columbia Delgamuukw v British Columbia Delgamuukw v British Columbia
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Blockquote dbt:Main dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Canadian_Aboriginal_case_law dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2
docket	23799 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	Cory and Major JJ (en)
citations	[1997] 3 SCR 1010 (en)
majority	Lamer CJ (en)
has abstract	Delgamuukw v British Columbia, [1997] 3 SCR 1010, also known as Delgamuukw v The Queen, Delgamuukw-Gisday’wa, or simply Delgamuukw, is a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada that contains its first comprehensive account of Aboriginal title (a distinct kind of Aboriginal right) in Canada. The Gitxsan and Wet’suwet’en peoples claimed Aboriginal title and jurisdiction over 58,000 square kilometers in northwest British Columbia. The plaintiffs lost the case at trial, but the Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal in part and ordered a new trial because of deficiencies relating to the pleadings and treatment of evidence. In this decision, the Court went on to describe the "nature and scope" of the protection given to Aboriginal title under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, defined how a claimant can prove Aboriginal title, and clarified how the justification test from R v Sparrow applies when Aboriginal title is infringed. The decision is also important for its treatment of oral testimony as evidence of historic occupation. While much of the decision is technically obiter dicta (since a new trial was ordered due to errors in how the evidence and pleadings were treated), the principles from Delgamuukw were restated and summarized in Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44. There has not yet been a second trial in this case. (en) Delgamuukw c. Colombie-Britannique ou Delgamuukw c. La Reine est une décision de la Cour suprême du Canada où la cour a spécifiquement refusé de faire une déclaration définitive sur la nature du titre ancestral autochtone au Canada. (fr) デルガムーク対ブリティッシュ・コロンビア州の訴訟 3 S.C.R. 1010 i（カナダでは、訴訟はX対Yの形で表される）は、カナダ先住民であるギッサン・ネイションおよびウェトスウェッテン・ネイションが、およそ54,000平方キロメートルの土地に対する権原の確認を求めて起こした訴訟である。ブリティッシュ・コロンビア州最高上訴裁判所（最高裁判所）による1997年の判決は、カナダにおけるの性質をめぐるもっとも決定的な言明として有名である。 (ja)
case-name	Delgamuukw v British Columbia (en)
Concurrence	La Forest J (en) McLachlin J (en)
decided-date	1997-12-11 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Delgamuukw, also known as Earl Muldoe, suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all the members of the Houses of Delgamuukw and Haaxw v Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia and The Attorney General of Canada (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software