About: Doctrine of capacities

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Doctrine of capacities Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDoctrine_of_capacities

The doctrine of capacities is a concept in political theory of medieval England which asserts a distinction between the person of the King and the institution of the Crown. The roots of this political theory can be traced back to the years shortly after the Norman Conquest. Here the distinction was made between the ecclesiastics in their temporal and spiritual capacities. When William the Conqueror brought a case against his brother Odo of Bayeux, Odo defended himself by claiming that as a bishop he could not be prosecuted by lay authorities. William replied that he was not being prosecuted in his capacity as bishop, but in his temporal capacity as Earl of Kent. In the reign of Edward I, the principle was applied to the chancellor, to distinguish between his official capacities. Even more

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Doctrine of capacities (en)
rdfs:comment	The doctrine of capacities is a concept in political theory of medieval England which asserts a distinction between the person of the King and the institution of the Crown. The roots of this political theory can be traced back to the years shortly after the Norman Conquest. Here the distinction was made between the ecclesiastics in their temporal and spiritual capacities. When William the Conqueror brought a case against his brother Odo of Bayeux, Odo defended himself by claiming that as a bishop he could not be prosecuted by lay authorities. William replied that he was not being prosecuted in his capacity as bishop, but in his temporal capacity as Earl of Kent. In the reign of Edward I, the principle was applied to the chancellor, to distinguish between his official capacities. Even more (en)
dcterms:subject	Political history of medieval England Monarchism Medieval English law
Wikipage page ID	23825637 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	999450221 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Hugh Despenser the Younger Right of revolution Earl of Kent Ordinances of 1311 Spiritualities Edward II of England Edward I of England Lord Chancellor Favourite William I of England Norman conquest of England Political history of medieval England King Monarchism Treason Medieval English law Odo of Bayeux Royal prerogative Temporalities Piers Gaveston Political theory Declaration of 1308 Medieval England
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://archive.org/details/thomasoflancaste0000madd https://archive.org/details/kingstwobodiesst00kant_656%7Curl-access=limited%7Cpublisher=Princeton https://archive.org/details/kingstwobodiesst00kant_656/page/n189
sameAs	Doctrine of capacities Doctrine of capacities Doctrine of capacities
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_book dbt:Reflist dbt:Spaced_ndash
has abstract	The doctrine of capacities is a concept in political theory of medieval England which asserts a distinction between the person of the King and the institution of the Crown. The roots of this political theory can be traced back to the years shortly after the Norman Conquest. Here the distinction was made between the ecclesiastics in their temporal and spiritual capacities. When William the Conqueror brought a case against his brother Odo of Bayeux, Odo defended himself by claiming that as a bishop he could not be prosecuted by lay authorities. William replied that he was not being prosecuted in his capacity as bishop, but in his temporal capacity as Earl of Kent. In the reign of Edward I, the principle was applied to the chancellor, to distinguish between his official capacities. Even more significantly, Edward I himself tied the doctrine to the institution of the monarchy, when he tried to revoke a grant he had made as prince after he became king, claiming that he was to be considered a different person then. In April 1308, in a document presented in parliament, certain barons used the doctrine of capacities to justify opposition against King Edward II. The specific case revolved around King Edward's favourite Piers Gaveston, whom the opposition wanted exiled. This Declaration of 1308 argued that it was the subjects' duty to protect the dignity of the Crown, even if that meant opposition to the King – an act that would normally signify treason. In 1321, however, the opposition against Edward II took the opposite position when they accused Hugh Despenser the Younger of his participation in the Declaration of 1308. By this accusation the doctrine was largely discredited, and rarely used again in the medieval period. (en)
gold:hypernym	Concept
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Doctrine_of_capacities?oldid=999450221&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	4799 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Doctrine_of_capacities
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	History of monarchy in the United Kingdom Boulogne agreement
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Doctrine_of_capacities

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software