About: E.S. v. Austria (2018)

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: E.S. v. Austria (2018) Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FE.S._v._Austria_%282018%29

E.S v. Austria was a case held before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case where the court upheld a domestic court's fine on an Austrian woman who had called Mohammed a pedophile. The applicant, E.S., is an Austrian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Vienna. In September 2022, the subsequent ECtHR case overturned E.S. v Austria, and ruled that Polish courts in a similar case concerning Catholicism "failed to identify and carefully weigh the competing interests at stake" and overturned a 2012 conviction for blasphemy. The court declared

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	E.S. v. Austria (2018) (en)
rdfs:comment	E.S v. Austria was a case held before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case where the court upheld a domestic court's fine on an Austrian woman who had called Mohammed a pedophile. The applicant, E.S., is an Austrian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Vienna. In September 2022, the subsequent ECtHR case overturned E.S. v Austria, and ruled that Polish courts in a similar case concerning Catholicism "failed to identify and carefully weigh the competing interests at stake" and overturned a 2012 conviction for blasphemy. The court declared (en)
dcterms:subject	Blasphemy law in Europe European Court of Human Rights cases involving Austria
Wikipage page ID	58928167 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1114052706 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Blasphemy law in Europe Humanists UK Universal Declaration of Human Rights European Court of Human Rights cases involving Austria Muhammad Aisha European Court of Human Rights The Atlantic Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights Secular humanism Humanists International UN Human Rights Council dbr:Rabczewska_v._Poland
sameAs	E.S. v. Austria (2018) E.S. v. Austria (2018)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Case-law-stub dbt:Cquote dbt:Italic_title dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_European_case
chamber	Chamber (en)
court	ECtHR (en)
DecideYear	2018 (xsd:integer)
fullname	E.S. AS v. Austria (en)
keywords	Freedom of expression (en)
has abstract	E.S v. Austria was a case held before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case where the court upheld a domestic court's fine on an Austrian woman who had called Mohammed a pedophile. The applicant, E.S., is an Austrian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Vienna. In October and November 2009, Mrs S. held two seminars entitled “Basic Information on Islam”, in which she discussed the marriage between the Islamic prophet Muhammad and a six-year old girl, Aisha, which was consummated when she was nine. Inter alia, the applicant stated that Muhammad “liked to do it with children” and “… A 56-year-old and a six-year-old? … What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?”. On 15 February 2011, the Vienna Regional Criminal Court found that these statements implied that Muhammad had had paedophilic tendencies, and convicted Mrs S. for disparaging religious doctrines. She was ordered to pay a fine of 480 euros and the costs of the proceedings. Mrs S. appealed but the Vienna Court of Appeal upheld the decision in December 2011, confirming in essence the lower court’s findings. In September 2022, the subsequent ECtHR case overturned E.S. v Austria, and ruled that Polish courts in a similar case concerning Catholicism "failed to identify and carefully weigh the competing interests at stake" and overturned a 2012 conviction for blasphemy. The court declared The time has come to reassess this case-law. Which new direction should be taken? One new approach could be to examine all blasphemy-related restrictions on freedom of expression under Article 10 exclusively in terms of the legitimate aim of protecting public order (religious peace). We consider that the following paragraph (no. 15) of PACE Recommendation 1805 (2007) is potentially very important for any such new direction: “national law should only penalise expressions concerning religious matters which intentionally and severely disturb public order and call for public violence” (see paragraph 29 of the judgment). (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:E.S._v._Austria_(2018)?oldid=1114052706&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10261 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:E.S._v._Austria_(2018)
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Blasphemy List of European Court of Human Rights judgments Blasphemy law E.S. v. Austria
is Wikipage redirect of	E.S. v. Austria
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:E.S._v._Austria_(2018)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software