About: Ex parte Young

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Ex parte Young Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FEx_parte_Young

Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Ex parte Young (en)
rdfs:comment	Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution. (en)
foaf:name	Ex parte Edward T. Young, Petitioner (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases Legal history of Minnesota Northern Pacific Railway United States Commerce Clause case law 1908 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court United States Eleventh Amendment case law
Wikipage page ID	1637439 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1062358352 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 209 Unconstitutional Dormant Commerce Clause Due Process Clause Injunction State actor United States Supreme Court cases Constitution of the United States Contempt of court Legal history of Minnesota Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution Northern Pacific Railway Legal fiction Rufus W. Peckham Supremacy Clause Minnesota Attorney General United States Commerce Clause case law 1908 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court U.S. state Jurisdiction Erwin Chemerinsky Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Northern Pacific Railway United States federal courts Habeas corpus Hans v. Louisiana State of Minnesota United States Eleventh Amendment case law John Marshall Harlan L. Ed. Supreme Court of the United States Edward T. Young Rail transport Certiorari Writ of habeas corpus Sovereign immunity Sovereign immunity in the United States United States Circuit Court U.S. LEXIS U.S. Marshals Service
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/209/123.html%7Cjustia=http:/supreme.justia.com/us/209/123/case.html
sameAs	Ex parte Young Ex parte Young Ex parte Young Ex parte Young
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:US11thAmendment dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:More_footnotes dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Harlan (en)
JoinMajority	Fuller, Brewer, White, McKenna, Holmes, Day, Moody (en)
LawsApplied	Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
ParallelCitations	28 (xsd:integer)
Prior	Petition for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari (en)
USPage	123 (xsd:integer)
USVol	209 (xsd:integer)
ArgueYear	1907 (xsd:integer)
case	Ex parte Young, (en)
DecideDate	0001-03-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1908 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/209/123.html%7Cjustia=http:/supreme.justia.com/us/209/123/case.html
fullname	Ex parte Edward T. Young, Petitioner (en)
Holding	A lawsuit seeking an injunction against a state official did not violate the sovereign immunity of the state, because the state official was not acting on behalf of the state when he sought to enforce an unconstitutional law. (en)
Litigants	Ex parte Young (en)
majority	Peckham (en)
has abstract	Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution. (en)
ArgueDateA	0001-12-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueDateB	3 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	United

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software