About: Geiger v. Kitzhaber

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Geiger v. Kitzhaber Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FGeiger_v._Kitzhaber

Geiger v. Kitzhaber is a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon that requires Oregon to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions. The decision arose from two consolidated cases that alleged that Oregon's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, Article 15, § 5, and all related marriage statutes, violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Among the several defendants, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed appearances in the case to defend Oregon's position, but declined to defend the constitutionality of the bans and ordered state agencies to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages established elsewhere.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases yago:WikicatOngoingLegalCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Geiger v. Kitzhaber (en)
rdfs:comment	Geiger v. Kitzhaber is a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon that requires Oregon to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions. The decision arose from two consolidated cases that alleged that Oregon's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, Article 15, § 5, and all related marriage statutes, violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Among the several defendants, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed appearances in the case to defend Oregon's position, but declined to defend the constitutionality of the bans and ordered state agencies to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages established elsewhere. (en)
name	Geiger v. Kitzhaber (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	LGBT in Oregon 2013 in Oregon 2014 in Oregon United States same-sex union case law 2014 in LGBT history 2014 in United States case law Legal history of Oregon United States District Court for the District of Oregon cases
Wikipage page ID	42322862 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1117337625 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	En banc F. Supp. 2d United States District Court for the District of Oregon United States v. Windsor Due Process Clause National Organization for Marriage LGBT in Oregon Ellen Rosenblum N. Randy Smith Equal Protection Clause LGBT rights in Oregon Oregon Department of Justice Anthony Kennedy 2013 in Oregon 2014 in Oregon United States same-sex union case law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Supreme Court 2014 in LGBT history Same-sex marriage in California Same-sex marriage in Oregon Same-sex marriage in Washington (state) 2014 in United States case law John Kitzhaber Supreme Court of the United States Mary M. Schroeder Legal history of Oregon United States District Court for the District of Oregon cases Portland, Oregon Michael J. McShane Summary judgment United States courts of appeals Multnomah County Sidney Runyan Thomas 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon dbr:S:Oregon_Constitution/Article_XV
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/060414zr_73bi.pdf http://media.oregonlive.com/politics_impact/other/OPINION.pdf http://media.oregonlive.com/politics_impact/other/mcshaneorder-1.pdf http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2014/08/27/14-35427%20Order%208-27.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=9653016037172204268 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4366000/geiger-v-kitzhaber/
sameAs	Geiger v. Kitzhaber Geiger v. Kitzhaber Geiger v. Kitzhaber Geiger v. Kitzhaber
subsequent actions	0001-05-04 (xsd:gMonthDay) 0001-05-27 (xsd:gMonthDay) U.S. Court of Appeals (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Clear dbt:Portal dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_U.S._District_Court_for_the_District_of_Oregon.gif?width=300
docket	6 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	2014-04-23 (xsd:date)
citations	172800.0 (second)
court	United States District Court for the District of Oregon
full name	and (en) v. (en) Deanna L. Geiger and Janine M. Nelson, William Griesar and Robert Duehmig, Plaintiffs (en) Paul Rummell and Benjamin West, Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner, Basic Rights Education Fund, Plaintiffs (en) John Kitzhaber, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon, Ellen Rosenblum, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General, Jennifer Woodward, in her official capacity as State Registrar, Center of Health Statistics, and Randy Walruff, in his official capacity as Multnomah County Assessor, Defendants (en)
Holding	Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment granted. Oregon's marriage laws that exclude "same-gender" gay and lesbian couples violate equal protection (en)
imagesize	150 (xsd:integer)
keywords	Same-sex marriage, equal protection, due process, marriage equality, discrimination (en)
has abstract	Geiger v. Kitzhaber is a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon that requires Oregon to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions. The decision arose from two consolidated cases that alleged that Oregon's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, Article 15, § 5, and all related marriage statutes, violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Among the several defendants, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed appearances in the case to defend Oregon's position, but declined to defend the constitutionality of the bans and ordered state agencies to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages established elsewhere. U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane ruled on May 19, 2014, that Oregon's constitution and statutes restricting marriage rights for same-sex couples violate the U.S. Constitution and ordered an immediate end to their enforcement. The National Organization for Marriage, an organization opposed to same-sex marriage, tried without success to intervene in the suit, to stay enforcement of the district court decision, and to appeal that decision. (en)
date decided	2014-05-19 (xsd:date)
judge	Michael J. McShane
number of judges	1 (xsd:integer)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Geiger_v._Kitzhaber?oldid=1117337625&ns=0

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software