• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Hedges v. Obama     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:State100024720, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:WikicatCivilLibertiesInTheUnitedStatesyago:WikicatLegalIssuesRelatedToTheSeptember11Attacksyago:WikicatU.S.NationalDefenseAuthorizationActsyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Abstraction105854150yago:Act106532095yago:Attribute100024264yago:Case107308889yago:CivilLiberty113995662yago:Cognition100023271yago:Communication100033020yago:Concept105835747yago:Content105809192yago:Document106470073yago:Event100029378yago:Freedom113991823yago:Happening107283608yago:HumanRight105176846yago:Idea105833840yago:Issue105814650yago:LegalDocument106479665yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatHumanRightsInTheUnitedStatesyago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Right105174653yago:State100024720 New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Hedges v. Obama was a lawsuit filed in January 2012 against the Obama administration and members of the U.S. Congress by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges, challenging the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA). The legislation permitted the U.S. government to indefinitely detain people "who are part of or substantially support Al Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States". The plaintiffs contended that Section 1021(b)(2) of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on "suspicion of providing substantial support" to groups engaged in hostilities against the U.S. such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban respectively that the NDAA arms the U.S