Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941), is a case applying the law of conflict preemption. The United States Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania state system of alien registration was superseded by a federal system (the Alien Registration Act) because it was an "obstacle to the accomplishment" of its goals.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Hines v. Davidowitz (en)
- 하인스 대 데이비도윗츠 사건 (ko)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941), is a case applying the law of conflict preemption. The United States Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania state system of alien registration was superseded by a federal system (the Alien Registration Act) because it was an "obstacle to the accomplishment" of its goals. (en)
- 하인스 대 데이비도윗츠 사건(Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941))은 외국인등록법이 단순히 외국인의 등록의무를 규정하고 있는 경우, 어느 주정부가 외국인에게 1년에 1회씩 주정부 공무원에게 외국인등록증을 제시하고 재등록하도록 의무화하는 내용의 주법을 제정할 수 없다고 판시한 판례이다. 이유는 외국인에 대한 사항은 연방정부가 미국 전체에 걸쳐 통일적이고 동일하게 규제하여야 하기 때문이다. (ko)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Hines, Secretary of Labor and Industry of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Davidowitz, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Roberts, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy (en)
|
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Hines v. Davidowitz, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Hines, Secretary of Labor and Industry of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Davidowitz, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - A state system of alien registration was superseded by a federal system because it was an "obstacle to accomplishment" of its goals. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941), is a case applying the law of conflict preemption. The United States Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania state system of alien registration was superseded by a federal system (the Alien Registration Act) because it was an "obstacle to the accomplishment" of its goals. (en)
- 하인스 대 데이비도윗츠 사건(Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941))은 외국인등록법이 단순히 외국인의 등록의무를 규정하고 있는 경우, 어느 주정부가 외국인에게 1년에 1회씩 주정부 공무원에게 외국인등록증을 제시하고 재등록하도록 의무화하는 내용의 주법을 제정할 수 없다고 판시한 판례이다. 이유는 외국인에 대한 사항은 연방정부가 미국 전체에 걸쳐 통일적이고 동일하게 규제하여야 하기 때문이다. (ko)
|
ArgueDateA
| |
ArgueDateB
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |