About: Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FHuddart%2C_Parker_%26_Co_Pty_Ltd_v_Moorehead

Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead is a leading decision by the High Court of Australia that dealt with two issues under the Australian Constitution, the identification and extent of judicial power that is vested in the courts and the corporations power of the Parliament. The Court unanimously held that the inquiry provisions of the Australian Industries Preservation Act 1906 were not an exercise of judicial power. The judgement of Griffith CJ in particular continues to be cited in relation to its examination of the identification and extent of judicial power. The court however divided on the proper approach to the corporations power. The majority, Griffith CJ, Barton & O'Connor JJ, strongly influenced by the now discredited doctrine of reserved State powers, held that the corporatio

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (en)
rdfs:comment	Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead is a leading decision by the High Court of Australia that dealt with two issues under the Australian Constitution, the identification and extent of judicial power that is vested in the courts and the corporations power of the Parliament. The Court unanimously held that the inquiry provisions of the Australian Industries Preservation Act 1906 were not an exercise of judicial power. The judgement of Griffith CJ in particular continues to be cited in relation to its examination of the identification and extent of judicial power. The court however divided on the proper approach to the corporations power. The majority, Griffith CJ, Barton & O'Connor JJ, strongly influenced by the now discredited doctrine of reserved State powers, held that the corporatio (en)
name	Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Australian constitutional law 1909 in Australian law 1909 in case law Corporations power in the Australian Constitution cases High Court of Australia cases
Wikipage page ID	52055842 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1116694649 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Prime Minister of Australia Queensland Samuel Griffith Australian Constitution Australian constitutional law Billy Hughes Departmental secretary Howard Smith Limited Attorney-General for Australia Chapter III Court Union Company 1909 in Australian law Chief Justice of Australia Department of Trade and Customs (Australia) Monopoly 1913 Australian referendum Magistrates' Court of Victoria Maitland, New South Wales Stanley Bruce Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd Competition law Australian constitutional law Australian pound Adelaide Steamship Company 1909 in case law Western Australia Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd Edmund Barton Corporations power in the Australian Constitution cases Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd. Parliament of Australia List of High Court of Australia cases Price fixing H. B. Higgins High Court of Australia Isaac Isaacs Tasmania Attorney-General for NSW v Brewery Employees Union of NSW High Court of Australia cases Coins of the Australian pound South Australia Free market Huddart Parker Natural justice New South Wales Newcastle, New South Wales Australian referendum, 1911 (Trade and Commerce) Australian referendum, 1913 (Corporations) Australian referendum, 1926 (Industry and Commerce) Cartel R v Barger Section 51(i) of the Constitution of Australia William Thomas Appleton Unfair competition Victoria, Australia Richard Edward O'Connor Section 51(xxxv) of the Constitution of Australia Justices Reserved State powers Adelaide Steamship Judicial power Coastal shipping Section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1920/54.pdf http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1909/36.pdf
sameAs	Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Abbr dbt:No dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Yes dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
court	High Court of Australia
full name	Appleton v Moorehead (en) Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead; (en)
judges	Griffith CJ, Barton, O'Connor, Isaacs and Higgins JJ (en)
keywords	Australian constitutional law (en) (en) corporations power (en) judicial power (en)
has abstract	Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead is a leading decision by the High Court of Australia that dealt with two issues under the Australian Constitution, the identification and extent of judicial power that is vested in the courts and the corporations power of the Parliament. The Court unanimously held that the inquiry provisions of the Australian Industries Preservation Act 1906 were not an exercise of judicial power. The judgement of Griffith CJ in particular continues to be cited in relation to its examination of the identification and extent of judicial power. The court however divided on the proper approach to the corporations power. The majority, Griffith CJ, Barton & O'Connor JJ, strongly influenced by the now discredited doctrine of reserved State powers, held that the corporations power was to be construed narrowly because the trade and commerce power did not include intrastate trade and commerce. While the reserved powers doctrine was unambiguously rejected by the High Court in 1920, Huddart, Parker was not formally overruled by the High Court until Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971). (en)
date decided	1909-06-07 (xsd:date)
opinions	(per Griffith CJ, Barton, O'Connor & Higgins JJ) (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software