• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Icons of Evolution     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Book_CW, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingbibo:Bookschema:Bookschema:CreativeWorkworkText (literary theory)wikidata:Q386724Bookyago:Artifact100021939yago:Book106410904yago:Creation103129123yago:Object100002684yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Product104007894yago:Publication106589574yago:WikicatIntelligentDesignBooksyago:Work104599396bookwritten workyago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat2002Booksyago:WikicatEnglish-languageBooksumbel-rc:Book_CW New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Icons of Evolution is a book by Jonathan Wells, an advocate of the pseudoscientific intelligent design argument for the existence of God and fellow of the Discovery Institute, in which Wells criticizes the paradigm of evolution by attacking how it is taught. The book includes a 2002 video companion. In 2000, Wells summarized the book's contents in an article in the American Spectator. Several of the scientists whose work is sourced in the book have written rebuttals to Wells, stating that they were quoted out of context, that their work has been misrepresented, or that it does not imply Wells's conclusions.