About: Jumping to conclusions

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Jumping to conclusions Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FJumping_to_conclusions

Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions". In other words, "when I fail to distinguish between what I observed first hand from what I have only inferred or assumed". Because it involves making decisions without having enough information to be sure that one is right, this can give rise to poor or rash decisions that often cause more harm to something than good.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	القفز إلى الاستنتاجات (ar) Jumping to conclusions (en) 妄下结论 (zh)
rdfs:comment	القفز إلى الاستنتاجات (بالإنجليزية: Jumping to conclusions)‏ ويُعرف رسميا باسم تحيز الاستنتاج القافز (بالإنجليزية: jumping conclusion bias)‏ هو مصطلح نفسي يُشير إلى عقبة في التواصل، حيث يقرر الشخص شيء ما أو يحكم على شيء ما دون أن يكون ملما بكل الحقائق المتعلقة به؛ ليصل إلى استنتاجات غير مضمونة. فكأنه يري بعض جوانب الموضوع، ليقفز بعدها إلي استنتاج متسرع غير مبني علي دراسة كافة جوانب الموضوع. بعبارة أخرى، هو فشل الشخص في التممييز بين ما يلاحظه مباشرة من ما استنتجته أو افترضته فقط". ولأن القفز إلى الاستنتاج ينطوي على اتخاذ قرارات دون الحصول على معلومات كافية للتأكد من صحة القرار، فإن هذا بالضرورة يمكن أن يؤدي إلى قرارات سيئة. (ar) Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions". In other words, "when I fail to distinguish between what I observed first hand from what I have only inferred or assumed". Because it involves making decisions without having enough information to be sure that one is right, this can give rise to poor or rash decisions that often cause more harm to something than good. (en) 妄下结论（英語：jumping to conclusions）是心理学术语，指在没有掌握所有事实的情况下判断或决定某事；得出毫无根据的结论。换句话说，“当我无法区分我第亲身观察到的东西和我仅仅推断或假设的东西时”。由于它涉及到在没有足够的信息来确定一个人是正确的情况下做出决定，这可能会产生不良或草率的决定，往往对某些事情造成更多不良的影响。 (zh)
dcterms:subject	Informal fallacies Cognitive biases
Wikipage page ID	12845426 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1088760781 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Inference Presumption of guilt Correlation does not imply causation Cognitive distortion The Phantom Tollbooth Delusion Half-truth Informal fallacies Fallacy Fallacy of the single cause Jan Harold Brunvand Cognitive biases Leap of faith Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/ https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=hNuVFzfcIJ0C&pg=PA196
sameAs	Jumping to conclusions Jumping to conclusions Jumping to conclusions Jumping to conclusions Jumping to conclusions Jumping to conclusions
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Portal dbt:Reflist
has abstract	القفز إلى الاستنتاجات (بالإنجليزية: Jumping to conclusions)‏ ويُعرف رسميا باسم تحيز الاستنتاج القافز (بالإنجليزية: jumping conclusion bias)‏ هو مصطلح نفسي يُشير إلى عقبة في التواصل، حيث يقرر الشخص شيء ما أو يحكم على شيء ما دون أن يكون ملما بكل الحقائق المتعلقة به؛ ليصل إلى استنتاجات غير مضمونة. فكأنه يري بعض جوانب الموضوع، ليقفز بعدها إلي استنتاج متسرع غير مبني علي دراسة كافة جوانب الموضوع. بعبارة أخرى، هو فشل الشخص في التممييز بين ما يلاحظه مباشرة من ما استنتجته أو افترضته فقط". ولأن القفز إلى الاستنتاج ينطوي على اتخاذ قرارات دون الحصول على معلومات كافية للتأكد من صحة القرار، فإن هذا بالضرورة يمكن أن يؤدي إلى قرارات سيئة. (ar) Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions". In other words, "when I fail to distinguish between what I observed first hand from what I have only inferred or assumed". Because it involves making decisions without having enough information to be sure that one is right, this can give rise to poor or rash decisions that often cause more harm to something than good. (en) 妄下结论（英語：jumping to conclusions）是心理学术语，指在没有掌握所有事实的情况下判断或决定某事；得出毫无根据的结论。换句话说，“当我无法区分我第亲身观察到的东西和我仅仅推断或假设的东西时”。由于它涉及到在没有足够的信息来确定一个人是正确的情况下做出决定，这可能会产生不良或草率的决定，往往对某些事情造成更多不良的影响。 (zh)
gold:hypernym	Term
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Jumping_to_conclusions?oldid=1088760781&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	11751 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Jumping_to_conclusions
is rdfs:seeAlso of	Leap of faith
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of fallacies Metacognitive training Arbitrary inference JTC Cherry picking Questionable cause Miracle Half-truth Faulty generalization False statement Hindsight bias Association fallacy Cognitive restructuring Jump to conclusions
is Wikipage redirect of	Jump to conclusions
is Wikipage disambiguates of	JTC
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Jumping_to_conclusions

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software