About: Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatRightsInTheAustralianConstitutionCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation

Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation is a High Court of Australia case that upheld the existence of an implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution, but found that it did not necessarily provide a defence to a defamation action. The High Court extended the defence of qualified privilege to be compatible with the freedom of political communication.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	place yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Abstraction105854150 yago:Case107308889 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Content105809192 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Idea105833840 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Right105174653 yago:WikicatRightsInTheAustralianConstitutionCases
rdfs:label	Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (en)
rdfs:comment	Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation is a High Court of Australia case that upheld the existence of an implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution, but found that it did not necessarily provide a defence to a defamation action. The High Court extended the defence of qualified privilege to be compatible with the freedom of political communication. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Australian constitutional law 1997 in case law Rights in the Australian Constitution cases 1997 in Australian law Australian defamation case law Australian Broadcasting Corporation High Court of Australia cases
Wikipage page ID	5662691 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1101609947 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Prime Minister of New Zealand Australian constitutional law David Lange John Toohey (judge) Constitution of Australia Chief Justice of Australia Qualified privilege Gerard Brennan Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd 1997 in case law Commonwealth Law Reports Australian Broadcasting Corporation Australian constitutional law Rights in the Australian Constitution cases 1997 in Australian law William Gummow Lange v Atkinson Daryl Dawson Four Corners (Australian TV program) Australian defamation case law High Court of Australia Michael McHugh (judge) Australian Broadcasting Corporation High Court of Australia cases Mary Gaudron McCloy v NSW Michael Kirby (judge) New South Wales New Zealand Labour Party TVNZ New Zealand general election, 1987 Justices Implied freedom of political communication dbr:Stephens_v_West_Australian_Newspapers
sameAs	Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:David_Lange dbt:Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Implied_freedom_of_political_communication_cases
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
court	High Court of Australia
full name	David Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (en)
judges	Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ (en)
has abstract	Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation is a High Court of Australia case that upheld the existence of an implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution, but found that it did not necessarily provide a defence to a defamation action. The High Court extended the defence of qualified privilege to be compatible with the freedom of political communication. (en)
date decided	1997-07-08 (xsd:date)
number of judges	7 (xsd:integer)
opinions	The Court decided to reconsider Theophanous and Stephens, and decided that those cases were incorrect. The Constitution does not confer personal rights as to the implied freedom of political communication (en)
gold:hypernym	Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation?oldid=1101609947&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	11045 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	David Lange Defamation Voting rights in Singapore Comcare v Banerji Clubb v Edwards Coleman v Power Monis v The Queen Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd Anthony Mason (judge) Australian constitutional law Brown v Tasmania Trial of Lex Wotton Lange v Atkinson Daryl Dawson Censorship in Australia

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software