• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Legal disputes over the Harry Potter series     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingyago:WikicatUnofficialAdaptationsyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Action100037396yago:Adaptation106408779yago:Choice100161243yago:Communication100033020yago:Controversy107183151yago:Decision100162632yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378yago:Move100165942yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatHarryPotterControversiesyago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:SpeechAct107160883yago:WikicatPlagiarismControversiesyago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Since first coming to wide notice in the late 1990s, the Harry Potter book series by J. K. Rowling has been the subject of a number of legal disputes. Rowling, her various publishers and Time Warner, the owner of the rights to the Harry Potter films, have taken numerous legal actions to protect their copyrights, and also have fielded accusations of copyright theft themselves. The worldwide popularity of the Harry Potter series has led to the appearance of a number of locally-produced, unauthorised sequels and other derivative works, leading to efforts to ban or contain them. While these legal proceedings have countered a number of cases of outright piracy, other attempts have targeted not-for-profit endeavours and have been criticised.