About: Medellín v. Texas

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Medellín v. Texas Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/41CsD2DCmV

Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless either the United States Congress has enacted statutes implementing it or the treaty is explicitly "self-executing". The Court also held that decisions of the International Court of Justice are not binding domestic law and, like treaties, cannot be enforced by the President of the United States without authority from Congress or the United States Constitution.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Medellín v. Texas (en) Medellín v. Texas (in) Medellín v. Texas (fr)
rdfs:comment	Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless either the United States Congress has enacted statutes implementing it or the treaty is explicitly "self-executing". The Court also held that decisions of the International Court of Justice are not binding domestic law and, like treaties, cannot be enforced by the President of the United States without authority from Congress or the United States Constitution. (en) Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), adalah sebuah putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat yang memutuskan bahwa meskipun sebuah perjanjian internasional dapat membentuk sebuah komitmen internasional, perjanjian tersebut tidak berlaku sebagai hukum domestik kecuali Kongres Amerika Serikat telah membentuk peraturan pelaksana atau jika perjajian tersebut memiliki kekuasaan (self-executing right). Dalam putusan ini, MA juga memutuskan bahwa putusan Mahkamah Internasional (ICJ) tidak berlaku mengikat sebagai hukum domestik Amerika Serikat, dan Presiden Amerika Serikat tidak memiliki kekuasaan untuk menegakkan perjanjian internasional atau putusan ICJ tanpa persetujuan dari Kongres. (in) L'arrêt Medellín v. Texas (552 U.S. 491 (2008)) est une décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendue le 25 mars 2008, et qui fait suite à un arrêt de la Cour internationale de justice du 31 mars 2004, Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.). En l'espèce, l'arrêt concernait l'application de la peine de mort au Texas, mais ses implications sont plus larges. (fr)
foaf:name	(en) José Ernesto Medellín v. Texas (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	United States federalism case law Capital punishment in Texas United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Ted Cruz United States Treaty Clause case law Mexico–United States relations 2008 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	16582076 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1119441764 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Capital punishment United States federalism case law President of the United States Samuel Alito David Souter Capital punishment in Texas List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court Paul Clement Rick Perry United States Attorney General United States Congress United States Constitution United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas United States Supreme Court Vienna Convention on Consular Relations International law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Congress of the Confederation Ruth Bader Ginsburg Self-executing right Clarence Thomas George W. Bush Miranda warning Murder Murders of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña Ted Cruz Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia Federal Reporter Houston, Texas CCH (company) Ware v. Hylton Washington, D.C. South Western Reporter 2016 United States presidential election 2007 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States Dames & Moore v. Regan United Nations Charter 2004 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus International Court of Justice Ted Cruz Texas Texas Court of Criminal Appeals United States Treaty Clause case law Mexico–United States relations Article Two of the United States Constitution 2008 in United States case law John G. Roberts L. Ed. 2d Treaty Solicitor General of Texas Mexico Case citation Rape Certiorari Writ of certiorari Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon Treaty of Paris of 1783 Mexican citizen Mexico v. United States of America Per curiam José Ernesto Medellín

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 76 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software