• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: MigrationWatch UK     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPoliticalPressureGroupsOfTheUnitedKingdom, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingpersonschema:Organizationdul:Agentdul:SocialPersonagentwikidata:Q24229398Organizationyago:WikicatThinkTanksBasedInTheUnitedKingdomyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Company108058098yago:Group100031264yago:Institution108053576yago:Lobby108375526yago:Organization108008335yago:PoliticalUnit108359949yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityorganisationyago:SocialGroup107950920yago:ThinkTank108478702yago:Unit108189659yago:WikicatPoliticalPressureGroupsOfTheUnitedKingdom New Facet based on Instances of this Class

MigrationWatch UK is a British think-tank and campaign group which argues for lower immigration into the United Kingdom. Founded in 2001, the group believes that international migration places undue demand on limited resources and that the current level of immigration is not sustainable. The group has been praised for what is seen as improving the quality of debate around immigration while others have suggested that the group is anti-immigration and have criticised what they say are faults in the group's studies.