• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Mohamed El Naschie     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEngineers, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingpersonyago:WikicatLivingPeopleyago:CausalAgent100007347yago:Engineer109615807yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Mathematician110301261yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Person100007846yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Physicist110428004yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:Scientist110560637yago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat20th-centuryMathematiciansyago:Wikicat20th-centuryPhysicistsyago:Wikicat21st-centuryMathematiciansyago:Wikicat21st-centuryPhysicistsyago:WikicatEgyptianEngineersyago:WikicatEgyptianPeopleyago:WikicatEgyptianPhysicistsyago:WikicatEgyptianScientistsyago:WikicatEngineers New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Mohamed El Naschie (Arabic: محمد النشائي), born in 1943, is an Egyptian engineer and the former editor of a controversial journal, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. The controversy concerned El Naschie's publication, over many years, of over 300 papers of questioned scientific merit authored by himself in his own journal with little or no apparent peer review. Published reports of his eventual departure from the editorship of the journal led to a lengthy libel court case that raised questions about the libel laws in Great Britain. The controversy has also played a role in discussions of the "impact factor" as a quality measure for scientific journals, and of the methodology of university rankings.