Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| - Martland, Ritchie, Beetz and de Grandpré JJ (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - Criminal Code, RSC 1970, c C-34, ss 45, 251, , 613, 603, 605, 618 (en)
|
citations
| - Morgentaler v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 616 (en)
|
history
| - APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec: R v Morgentaler, [1974] CA 129 . (en)
|
majority
| - Pigeon J (en)
- Dickson J (en)
|
ratio
| - Section 251 of the Criminal Code which prohibits abortion except under certain circumstances is a valid exercise of the federal criminal law power and does not infringe the Canadian Bill of Rights. The indictment was not an abuse of process. The defence of necessity did not apply, nor did the defence set out in s 45 of the Criminal Code relating to medical procedures. The Court of Appeal had the power to set aside the acquittal and enter a conviction, but this power is to be used with great circumspection. (en)
|
has abstract
| - Morgentaler v R (also known as Morgentaler v The Queen) is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where physician Henry Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the laws of federalism. This was the first of three Supreme Court decisions on abortion that were brought by Morgentaler. (en)
|
case-name
| |
Chief Justice
| |
Concurrence
| - Pigeon J (en)
- Dickson J (en)
|
Concurrence/Dissent
| |
decided-date
| |
full-case-name
| - Dr. Henry Morgentaler v Her Majesty The Queen and Attorney General of Canada, Foundation for Women in Crisis, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Alliance for Life, Association des médecins du Québec and the Front Commun pour le Respect de la vie, and Fondation pour la vie (en)
|
heard-date
| |
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
| - Judson and Spence JJ (en)
|
puisne-justices
| - Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz and de Grandpré JJ (en)
|
ruling
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |