About: NLRB v. Noel Canning

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: NLRB v. Noel Canning Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FNLRB_v._Noel_Canning

National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, 573 U.S. 513 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that the President of the United States cannot use his authority under the Recess Appointment Clause of the United States Constitution to appoint public officials unless the United States Senate is in recess and not able to transact Senate business. The Court held that the clause allows the president to make appointments during both intra-session and inter-session recesses but only if the recess is of sufficient length, and if the Senate is actually unavailable for deliberation, thereby limiting future recess appointments. The Court also ruled that any office vacancy can be filled during the recess, regardless of when it arose. The case arose out

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	NLRB v. Noel Canning (en)
rdfs:comment	National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, 573 U.S. 513 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that the President of the United States cannot use his authority under the Recess Appointment Clause of the United States Constitution to appoint public officials unless the United States Senate is in recess and not able to transact Senate business. The Court held that the clause allows the president to make appointments during both intra-session and inter-session recesses but only if the recess is of sufficient length, and if the Senate is actually unavailable for deliberation, thereby limiting future recess appointments. The Court also ruled that any office vacancy can be filled during the recess, regardless of when it arose. The case arose out (en)
foaf:name	(en) National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Noel Canning, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Constitution Article Two case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court 2014 in United States case law National Labor Relations Board litigation
Wikipage page ID	41644381 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1090664607 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States Constitution Article Two case law President of the United States Samuel Alito Pro forma John Roberts Pepsi Richard Cordray US House of Representatives United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit United States Senate United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clarence Thomas Elena Kagan Mitch McConnell Thomas Jefferson Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia Stephen Breyer Federalist No. 67 Barack Obama D.C. Cir. Alexander Hamilton Executive branch of the United States government Quorum Harry Reid Article Two of the United States Constitution 2014 in United States case law L. Ed. 2d Labor union National Labor Relations Board litigation Supreme Court of the United States Sonia Sotomayor National Labor Relations Board New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB Orrin Hatch Recess appointment Collective bargaining agreement Senate Judiciary Committee Distribution (marketing) Sharon Block (government official) Rules of the United States Senate F.3d US Solicitor General U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/113440p.pdf http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/Published/121514.p.pdf http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/D13E4C2A7B33B57A85257AFE00556B29/$file/12-1115-1417096.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/513/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20130125173 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1281/argument/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-1281 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1281_mc8p.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-1281_d1o2.pdf
sameAs	NLRB v. Noel Canning NLRB v. Noel Canning NLRB v. Noel Canning NLRB v. Noel Canning
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Refimprove-section dbt:US_Appointments_Clause
docket	12 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan (en)
LawsApplied	Article Two of the United States Constitution
OpinionAnnouncement	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1281_mc8p.pdf
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1281/argument/
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-1281
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software