National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] is an English land law and family law case, concerning the quality of a person's interest in a home when people live together, as well as licenses in land. The House of Lords, the court of final appeal, held that someone living in a home, who was deserted, did not by that fact alone have an interest in equity. Lord Wilberforce offered a definition of property rights, however this level of the decision was compromised, and forms heavily amended principles of law, as the concept of the constructive trust was developed further.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] is an English land law and family law case, concerning the quality of a person's interest in a home when people live together, as well as licenses in land. The House of Lords, the court of final appeal, held that someone living in a home, who was deserted, did not by that fact alone have an interest in equity. Lord Wilberforce offered a definition of property rights, however this level of the decision was compromised, and forms heavily amended principles of law, as the concept of the constructive trust was developed further. (en)
|
name
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (en)
|
foaf:depiction
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
thumbnail
| |
citations
| - [1965] 2 All ER 472 (en)
- [1965] 3 WLR 1 (en)
- [1965] AC 1175 (en)
- [1965] UKHL 1 (en)
|
court
| |
full name
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (en)
|
keywords
| - Licence; sole legal ownership; competing equities; equity of lender; repossession; law of mortgages; family home rights (en)
|
has abstract
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] is an English land law and family law case, concerning the quality of a person's interest in a home when people live together, as well as licenses in land. The House of Lords, the court of final appeal, held that someone living in a home, who was deserted, did not by that fact alone have an interest in equity. Lord Wilberforce offered a definition of property rights, however this level of the decision was compromised, and forms heavily amended principles of law, as the concept of the constructive trust was developed further. More widely approved has been its principles of the overturned decision in the court below: the judgment of Denning LJ (noting the concurrence by Donovan LJ) some of which were cited with approval in the House of Lords in this case also. (en)
|
concurring
| |
date decided
| |
decision by
| |
opinions
| - Lord Denning MR; Lord Wilberforce (en)
|
prior actions
| - National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd [1964] Ch 665 (en)
|
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |