About: Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/7KjDsXdUxF

Nguyen v Barnes & Noble, Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in which the Court ruled that Barnes & Noble's 2011 Terms of Use agreement, presented in a browsewrap manner via hyperlinks alone, was not enforceable since it failed to offer users reasonable notice of the terms. The decision set an important precedent on the future design and presentation of online contracts for consumer-facing e-commerce sites.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Nguyen v Barnes & Noble, Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in which the Court ruled that Barnes & Noble's 2011 Terms of Use agreement, presented in a browsewrap manner via hyperlinks alone, was not enforceable since it failed to offer users reasonable notice of the terms. The decision set an important precedent on the future design and presentation of online contracts for consumer-facing e-commerce sites. (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases United States contract case law 2014 in United States case law United States computer case law Barnes & Noble
Wikipage page ID	44237456 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1088875046 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	HP Touchpad Barnes & Noble Arbitration in the United States Hyperlinks United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit E-commerce Contracts Estoppel Constructive notice Choice of law Clickwrap United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases Actual notice United States contract case law Federal Arbitration Act 2014 in United States case law United States computer case law Register.com v. Verio Barnes & Noble Ticketmaster v. Tickets.com Browsewrap In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/08/18/12-56628.pdf
sameAs	Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:United_States_contract_case_law dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
ArgueDate	0001-05-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
citations	25920.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (en)
CourtSeal	Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg (en)
DecideDate	Aug 18 (en)
DecideYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Kevin Khoa Nguyen, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barnes & Noble Inc., Defendant-Appellant (en)
Holding	Where a website makes its terms of use available via a conspicuous hyperlink of every page of the website but otherwise provides no notice to users nor prompts them to take any affirmative action to demonstrate assent, even close proximity of the hyperlink to relevant buttons users must click on - without more - is insufficient to give rise to constructive notice of an arbitration agreement. (en)
judges	John T. Noonan and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Roslyn O. Silver, Senior District Judge (en)
sign	http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/08/18/12-56628.pdf Barnes & Noble's Terms of Use, Nguyen v Barnes & Noble Inc. (en)
text	"In light of the lack of controlling authority on point, and in keeping with courts' traditional reluctance to enforce browsewrap agreements against individual consumers, we therefore hold that where a website makes its terms of use available via a conspicuous hyperlink of every page of the website but otherwise provides no notice to users nor prompts them to take any affirmative action to demonstrate assent, even close proximity of the hyperlink to relevant buttons users must click on - without more - is insufficient to give rise to constructive notice." (en) "By visiting any area in the Barnes & Noble.com Site, creating an account [or] making a purchase via the Barnes & Noble.com Site... a User is deemed to have accepted the Terms of Use." (en)
has abstract	Nguyen v Barnes & Noble, Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in which the Court ruled that Barnes & Noble's 2011 Terms of Use agreement, presented in a browsewrap manner via hyperlinks alone, was not enforceable since it failed to offer users reasonable notice of the terms. The decision set an important precedent on the future design and presentation of online contracts for consumer-facing e-commerce sites. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Nguyen_v._Barnes_&_Noble,_Inc.?oldid=1088875046&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	11672 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Nguyen_v._Barnes_&_Noble,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Browsewrap Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc Nguyen v. Barnes and Noble
is Wikipage redirect of	Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc Nguyen v. Barnes and Noble
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Nguyen_v._Barnes_&_Noble,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software