About: O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/AbmqmKXfxu

O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 282 U.S. 251 (1931), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state statute limiting the commissions allowable by insurers against loss by fire to local agents will be deemed a valid exercise of the police power in the absence of facts showing it to be unreasonable.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. (en)
rdfs:comment
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 282 U.S. 251 (1931), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state statute limiting the commissions allowable by insurers against loss by fire to local agents will be deemed a valid exercise of the police power in the absence of facts showing it to be unreasonable. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.; O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co. Ltd. (en)
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Butler (en)
JoinMajority
  • Hughes, Holmes, Stone and Roberts (en)
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Cert. to the Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey, to review a judgment against the appellant in actions which it brought against the Insurance Companies to recover moneys claimed to be due to it for services as local agent. 105 N.J.L. 642; 20 Gummere 642; 146 A. 370 (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.; O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co. Ltd. (en)
Holding
  • A state statute limiting the commissions allowable by insurers against loss by fire to local agents will be deemed a valid exercise of the police power in the absence of facts showing it to be unreasonable. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. (en)
majority
  • Brandeis (en)
loc
has abstract
  • O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 282 U.S. 251 (1931), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state statute limiting the commissions allowable by insurers against loss by fire to local agents will be deemed a valid exercise of the police power in the absence of facts showing it to be unreasonable. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 55 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software