About: Paraphrasing of copyrighted material

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Paraphrasing of copyrighted material Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FParaphrasing_of_copyrighted_material

Paraphrasing of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, constitute copyright infringement. In most countries that have national copyright laws, copyright applies to the original expression in a work rather than to the meanings or ideas being expressed. Whether a paraphrase is an infringement of expression, or a permissible restatement of an idea, is not a binary question but a matter of degree. Copyright law in common law countries tries to avoid theoretical discussion of the nature of ideas and expression such as this, taking a more pragmatic view of what is called the idea/expression dichotomy. The acceptable degree of difference between a prior work and a paraphrase depends on a variety of factors and ultimately depends on the judgement of the court in each individual cas

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Content105809192 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
rdfs:label	إعادة صياغة المواد المحمية بحقوق التأليف والنشر (ar) Paraphrasing of copyrighted material (en)
rdfs:comment	قد ينخفض احتمال اكتشاف تزوير حقوق تأليف ونشر مادة ما إثر إعادة صياغة تلك المادة محفوظة الحقوق. لكن في الكثير من الحالات، اكتُشف أن إعادة الصياغة باستخدام الكلمات وتراكيب الجمل المختلفة عن الأصلية تُعتبر انتهاكًا لحقوق نشر وتأليف العمل الأصلي السابق لإعادة الصياغة. هناك درجة من القبول بخصوص الفرق بين العمل الأصلي والعمل المعاد صياغته بناءً على عدد من العوامل، وتعتمد درجة القبول تلك بشكل نهائي على قرار المحكمة بخصوص كل حالة فردية. (ar) Paraphrasing of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, constitute copyright infringement. In most countries that have national copyright laws, copyright applies to the original expression in a work rather than to the meanings or ideas being expressed. Whether a paraphrase is an infringement of expression, or a permissible restatement of an idea, is not a binary question but a matter of degree. Copyright law in common law countries tries to avoid theoretical discussion of the nature of ideas and expression such as this, taking a more pragmatic view of what is called the idea/expression dichotomy. The acceptable degree of difference between a prior work and a paraphrase depends on a variety of factors and ultimately depends on the judgement of the court in each individual cas (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Intellectual property law Legal doctrines and principles
Wikipage page ID	36189390 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1112991731 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Copyright Act of 1976 Substantial similarity Copyright Clause Copyright infringement Copyright law of the Soviet Union Touro Law Review Arnstein v. Porter Common law Michigan State Law Review Georgetown Law Journal Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Dresden Fair use Federal Judicial Center Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. Paraphrase Scènes à faire Intellectual property law Harvard University Press Article spinning Legal doctrines and principles Johann Heinrich Zedler Threshold of originality Circuit split Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon Copyright law Idea–expression distinction Merger doctrine (copyright law) Search engine optimization Aspen Publishers Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Idea/expression dichotomy Second Circuit Kluwer Law International The Journal of World Intellectual Property dbr:Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.jcel-pub.org/article/view/6481%7Cjournal=Journal http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=1034&context=iplj https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=3_v3HwgAaJ0C&pg=PA509%7Caccess-date=2012-06-24%7Cdate=2008-05-22 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=SA13-PA7 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=8-4catWPy84C&pg=PA100%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2012-03-08 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=FetCwyUjdFwC&pg=PA162%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2008-03-19 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=IqWoTkiveVEC&pg=PA163%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2010-10-28 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=JuVf2WVGXLIC&pg=PA130%7Caccess-date=2012-06-21 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=L2P3EHagf8cC%7Ctitle=The https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=rQINrHtwNU0C&pg=PA243%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=rdF_Ptl3PeAC&pg=PA31%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cyear=2011 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=y16QAAAAMAAJ&q=gorman+copyright http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/2009/06/the-future-of-newspapers--posner.html https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol26/iss1/10%7Cjournal= wiki-commons:File:Zedler_-_Protokoll_Verf%C3%BCgung_gegen_Zedler_(letzte_Seite).jpg%3Fuselang=de https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6j86d60d%7Cjournal= https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12172%7Cjournal= https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:35761/ https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol11/iss1/3%7Cjournal=
sameAs	Paraphrasing of copyrighted material Paraphrasing of copyrighted material Paraphrasing of copyrighted material Paraphrasing of copyrighted material Paraphrasing of copyrighted material
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Intellectual_property dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Cite_web dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Sfnm dbt:Harvid dbt:Selfref
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Zedler_-_Universal-Lexicon,_Band_1_(Titelblatt).jpg?width=300
1a	Davis (en) Ginsburg (en) Bently (en)
1p	191 (xsd:integer)
1y	2010 (xsd:integer)
2a	Head (en)
2p	243 (xsd:integer)
2y	2006 (xsd:integer)
has abstract	قد ينخفض احتمال اكتشاف تزوير حقوق تأليف ونشر مادة ما إثر إعادة صياغة تلك المادة محفوظة الحقوق. لكن في الكثير من الحالات، اكتُشف أن إعادة الصياغة باستخدام الكلمات وتراكيب الجمل المختلفة عن الأصلية تُعتبر انتهاكًا لحقوق نشر وتأليف العمل الأصلي السابق لإعادة الصياغة. هناك درجة من القبول بخصوص الفرق بين العمل الأصلي والعمل المعاد صياغته بناءً على عدد من العوامل، وتعتمد درجة القبول تلك بشكل نهائي على قرار المحكمة بخصوص كل حالة فردية. (ar) Paraphrasing of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, constitute copyright infringement. In most countries that have national copyright laws, copyright applies to the original expression in a work rather than to the meanings or ideas being expressed. Whether a paraphrase is an infringement of expression, or a permissible restatement of an idea, is not a binary question but a matter of degree. Copyright law in common law countries tries to avoid theoretical discussion of the nature of ideas and expression such as this, taking a more pragmatic view of what is called the idea/expression dichotomy. The acceptable degree of difference between a prior work and a paraphrase depends on a variety of factors and ultimately depends on the judgement of the court in each individual case. (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software