About: Peretz v. United States

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Peretz v. United States Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPeretz_v._United_States

Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991), was a Supreme Court of the United States case. The Court affirmed that a defendant in a federal criminal trial on a felony charge must affirmatively object to the supervising of jury selection by a magistrate judge, ruling that it is not enough that the defendant merely acquiesce to the magistrate's involvement in his case for a court to reverse a conviction for this reason.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Peretz v. United States (en)
rdfs:comment	Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991), was a Supreme Court of the United States case. The Court affirmed that a defendant in a federal criminal trial on a felony charge must affirmatively object to the supervising of jury selection by a magistrate judge, ruling that it is not enough that the defendant merely acquiesce to the magistrate's involvement in his case for a court to reverse a conviction for this reason. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Peretz v. United States (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Constitution Article Three case law United States Supreme Court cases 1991 in United States case law United States criminal procedure case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
Wikipage page ID	6269655 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1016954414 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	President of the United States United States Constitution Article Three case law John Paul Stevens List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 501 List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court Reversible error United States Congress United States Constitution United States Senate United States magistrate judge Defendant Due process United States Supreme Court cases Conviction 1991 in United States case law Felony Trial de novo Waiver Jury Jury selection United States criminal procedure case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Heroin Article III of the United States Constitution L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Trial United States court of appeals Illegal drug trade Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume United States federal judge Federal crime Voir dire dbr:United_States_v._Raddatz
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/923.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-615.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990/90-615 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/923/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep501/usrep501923/usrep501923.pdf
sameAs	Peretz v. United States Peretz v. United States Peretz v. United States Peretz v. United States
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleIII
Dissent	Marshall (en) Scalia (en)
JoinDissent	White, Blackmun (en)
JoinMajority	Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
LawsApplied	U.S. Const. art. III, Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (en)
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990/90-615
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	Defendant was charged with importing heroin. A federal magistrate conducted jury selection, and defendant acquiesced, raising no objection in the district court. On appeal, he contended that the magistrate's conducting jury selection violated his rights under Article III of the Constitution. The Second Circuit disagreed; cert. granted. (en)
USPage	923 (xsd:integer)
USVol	501 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1991 (xsd:integer)
case	Peretz v. United States, (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1991 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/923.html
fullname	Peretz v. United States (en)
Holding	If the parties consent, Article III and the Federal Magistrates Act allow a district court to delegate to a magistrate judge the responsibility for managing jury selection in a felony trial. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/923/
Litigants	Peretz v. United States (en)
majority	Stevens (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep501/usrep501923/usrep501923.pdf
has abstract	Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991), was a Supreme Court of the United States case. The Court affirmed that a defendant in a federal criminal trial on a felony charge must affirmatively object to the supervising of jury selection by a magistrate judge, ruling that it is not enough that the defendant merely acquiesce to the magistrate's involvement in his case for a court to reverse a conviction for this reason. (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-615.ZS.html
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Peretz_v._United_States?oldid=1016954414&ns=0

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software