About: R v Carroll

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Carroll Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/372MWKHLdv

R v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 is a decision of the High Court of Australia which unanimously upheld a Queensland appellate court's decision to stay an indictment for perjury as the indictment was found to controvert the respondent's earlier acquittal for murder. The court held that charging Raymond John Carroll with perjuring himself in the earlier murder trial by swearing he did not kill the baby Deidre Kennedy was tantamount to claiming he had committed the murder and was thus a contravention of the principles of double jeopardy. The case caused widespread public outcry and prompted calls for double jeopardy law reform.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R v Carroll (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 is a decision of the High Court of Australia which unanimously upheld a Queensland appellate court's decision to stay an indictment for perjury as the indictment was found to controvert the respondent's earlier acquittal for murder. The court held that charging Raymond John Carroll with perjuring himself in the earlier murder trial by swearing he did not kill the baby Deidre Kennedy was tantamount to claiming he had committed the murder and was thus a contravention of the principles of double jeopardy. The case caused widespread public outcry and prompted calls for double jeopardy law reform. (en)
name	R v Carroll (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	Perjury High Court of Australia cases 2002 in case law Australian criminal law 2002 in Australian law
Wikipage page ID	1116981 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1121464514 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Queensland Beyond a reasonable doubt Bob Carr Peter Beattie Rob Hulls Victoria (Australia) Double jeopardy Indictment Perjury Murder Murray Gleeson Commonwealth Law Reports Post-mortem Australian Broadcasting Corporation William Gummow 60 Minutes Acquittal Perjury High Court of Australia Ipswich, Queensland Michael McHugh (judge) High Court of Australia cases 2002 in case law Abuse of process Australian criminal law Kenneth Hayne Supreme Court of Queensland Mary Gaudron 2002 in Australian law New South Wales Prosecution Forensic odontology
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.doublejeopardy.com.au/ http://www.autrefoisacquit.info https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/asmade/act-2007-049 http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2003/s826674.htm http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2002/55.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QCA/2001/394.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QSC/2000/308.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JCULRev/2004/5.html
sameAs	R v Carroll R v Carroll R v Carroll
subsequent actions	none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
citations	213 (xsd:integer)
court	High Court of Australia
full name	The Queen v Raymond John Carroll (en)
judges	Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ (en)
has abstract	R v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 is a decision of the High Court of Australia which unanimously upheld a Queensland appellate court's decision to stay an indictment for perjury as the indictment was found to controvert the respondent's earlier acquittal for murder. The court held that charging Raymond John Carroll with perjuring himself in the earlier murder trial by swearing he did not kill the baby Deidre Kennedy was tantamount to claiming he had committed the murder and was thus a contravention of the principles of double jeopardy. The case caused widespread public outcry and prompted calls for double jeopardy law reform. (en)
date decided	2002-12-05 (xsd:date)
opinions	the perjury proceedings should have been stayed, as the Queensland Court of Appeal ordered, because the new trial breached the principle of double jeopardy, and was an abuse of process (en)
prior actions	R v Carroll 19 A Crim R 410 - original murder trial; R v Carroll [2000] QSC 308 - perjury trial in the Supreme Court of Queensland; R v Carroll [2001] QCA 394 - Queensland Court of Appeal decision (en)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Carroll?oldid=1121464514&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	7235 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Carroll
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Double jeopardy Carroll List of High Court of Australia cases R v carroll R. v. Carroll The Queen v. Carroll The Queen v Carroll
is Wikipage redirect of	R v carroll R. v. Carroll The Queen v. Carroll The Queen v Carroll
is Wikipage disambiguates of	Carroll
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Carroll

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software